Ehtesham Qutubuddin Siddique Vs CPIO, Ministry Of Home Affairs (Delhi High Court) Petitioner sought information by way of RTI application requiring disclosure of the proposal and all documents in the Department’s file regarding issuance of the notification under Section 45(1) of the Unlawful Activity (Prevention) Act 1967 (UPPA, 1967). CIC while upholding the view taken […]
Question that arises here for consideration is whether interest granted on award against claim nos.1 and 5 was grant of interest upon interest and barred by the Act of 1978.
HC held that domain name https://india-mart.co/ shall be immediately blocked. MeitY/DoT to issue blocking orders within 24 hours from receipt of present order.
Assessee to satisfy the authority by submitting Crypto currency ledger to verify information as was submitted by him before AO in proceedings under Section 148A
Section 51 of Copyright Act, 1957 – If any person uses without permission of licence owner or from Registrar, any product would amount to infringement of copyright.
Kunjal Synergies Private Limited Vs Principal Commissioner of Customs (Calcutta High Court) Facts, in short, are that the petitioner has approached this Writ Court for release of the goods in question provisionally under Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962 on the basis of the order of the Appellate Authority ordering for release of the […]
Nathuram Surendra Kumar Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) Chhattisgarh High Court accepts Writ petition challenging the Vires of Section 16 (4) of CGST Act 2017 Heard Mr. Palash Soni, learned counsel, appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. Ramakant Mishra, learned Assistant Solicitor General, appearing for the respondent No. 1, Mr. Gagan Tiwari, […]
Whether revocation of cancellation of GST registration can be allowed even after the statutory time limit given and extended time limit by authority has been expired due to Covid-19 Pandemic all over the world?
Whether interest on delayed GST payment as per section 50 of CGST Act, 2017 can be levied on gross tax liability instead of net liability?
Bombay High Court has held that a mere reference to a proposal containing an arbitration clause which was unilaterally signed by one party, would not amount to an arbitration agreement coming into existence between the parties. Suit filed before Trial Court stand restored.
