M/s Shanti Eat Udyog Surir Kala Tehsil Mant District Mathura Vs State of U.P. (Allahabad High Court) Admittedly, the period of limitation to file a first appeal under Section 107 of the U.P. Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 is three months and the period for which the delay may be condoned is thirty days […]
Since assessee was held entitled to claim deduction of its profits at the rate of 100% in terms of section 80-IC, therefore, additions made towards interest and bad debts so made were also entitled to deduction under section 80-IC resulting in no addition to the taxable income of assessee.
The Mavilayi Service Co-operative Bank Ltd Vs CIT (Kerala High Court) In view of the law laid down by the Apex Court in Citizen Co-operative Society v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax: AIR 2017 SC 5147, it cannot be contended that, while considering the claim made by an assessee society for deduction under Section 80P […]
Meghraj Moolchand Burad Vs Directorate General of GST (Intelligence) (Bombay High Court) The learned counsel appearing for the Investigating Agency has produced on record a letter dated 26.11.2018 addressed by Advocate on record of the applicant to the DGGI, Pune informing him that, the present matter was on board before this Court on 24.11.2018 at […]
Conclusion: AO was directed to wait in respect of tax ability of interest income received from the insurance company on MACT claim till the Supreme Court pronounce a judgement in Sharda Pareek v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & another as the same issue was pending before the Court.
Section 40(a)(ia) can be applied only when amount sought to be disallowed has been claimed as an expenditure/deduction. In absence of the amount having been claimed as expenditure while determining the income, dis allowance would not be attracted.
Transfer Pricing provisions on shares purchased at value in excess of FMV was not applicable as the same could only be invoked to bring to tax any income arising from an international transaction.
Deepak Fertilizers And Petrochemicals Corporation Limited Vs Add. CIT (Bombay High Court) HC held that we do not think that there is any justification for the Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 8(1) to threaten the appellant/applicant with any prosecution. Even if such prosecution under section 276C is launched, the same shall not proceed […]
Janardhanam Balaji Vs ACIT (Madras High Court) Right of appeal is not automatic. When statute confers a limited right of appeal only in a case which involves substantial question of law, it is not open to sit in appeal over factual findings arrived at by AO, CIT(A) and Appellate Tribunal. Hence, appeal was not entertained. […]
M. Suresh Company Pvt Ltd Vs Pr. CIT (Bombay High Court) 1. This Motion is taken by the appellant assessee in Income Tax Appeal No. 738 of 2016. The appeal arises out of a judgment of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal confirming penalty against the assessee under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. […]
