Pr. CIT Vs M/s. M. J. Exports Pvt. Ltd. (Bombay High Court) HC held that impugned order of the Tribunal after recording that the issue stands covered by various decisions of the Supreme Court and the various High Courts cases observes ‘admittedly, there are contrary decisions where it is held that interest paid on delayed […]
Bai Mamubai Trust Vs Suchitra (Bombay High Court) In the present case, where the Plaintiff has made out a strong prima facie case and the Defendant has not been able to demonstrate any semblance of right to occupy the Suit Premises, it cannot be said that the Defendant’s occupation pursuant to an Order of the […]
In the given case, the applicant is facing charges under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, for which maximum sentence is of five years. Hence the applicant wanted to apply for regular bail.
Rajesh Kumar Patel S/o Shri Ramsharan Vs Chief Information Commission (Chhattisgarh High Court) Admittedly, in this case, up till the filing of the second appeal, no information was supplied, however, the information when was supplied i.e. the copy of the cash-book, the petitioner contended that one copy was supplied twice. The commission therefore, on such […]
Bai Mumbai Trust Vs Suchitra (Bombay High Court) Issue raised whether GST is applicable on services or assistance rendered by the Court receiver appointed by the Court under order XL of CPC. Court observed that schedule III provides that services provided by any court or tribunal established under any law is neither a supply of […]
In the facts and circumstances of the case and considering the nature of allegations made against the applicant in the FIR and considering the admitted position that the applicant is arrested on 08.07.2019 and the fact that till date even after passage of 60 days, neither any complaint nor chargesheet is filed and therefore, the applicant would be entitled for default bail, without going into detail at this stage
In the given case, Revenue has challenged the order passed by the ITAT. Here issue under consideration is that, whether, waiver off loan on account by the lender on account of one time settlement of loan can be termed as revenue receipt or not?
Pr. CIT Vs NTPC Sail Power Co. Pvt. Ltd. (Delhi High Court) Electricity is capable of abstraction, transmission, transfer, delivery, possession, consumption and use like any other movable property. Following the same logic, to deny the benefit of additional depreciation to a generating entity on the basis that electricity is not an ‘article’ or ‘thing’ […]
High Court of Madras in the matter of Commissioner of CGST v. M/s. Daejung Moparts Pvt. Ltd. [W.A.Nos.2127 and 2151 of 2019] dated 23.07.2019 dismissed the Letter Patent Appeal filed by the department and upheld the order of single bench, whereby assessee was directed to pay interest consequent to delay in filing of Return, only on net tax liability (after deduction of Input Tax Component).
Petitioner is seeking directions to respondents to refund late fee collected from him while filing Form GSTR-3B in his Cash Ledger in GST Portal so that he can utilise it for discharging his tax liabilities.
