State of Kerala Vs Metro Minerals India (P) Ltd. (Kerala High Court) The transfer of property in goods whether as goods or in some other form involved in the execution of a works contract shall be deemed to have taken place in the State, if the goods are within the State at the time of […]
The Respondents are directed to permit Petitioner to upload TRAN-I on or before 30.06.2020 and in case Respondent fails to do so, the Petitioner would be at liberty to avail ITC in question in GSTR-3B of July 2020.
L&T Hydrocarbon Engineering Limited Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court) Learned Additional Government Advocate Sri.Vikram Huilgol for respondent No.2 submits that the appeal under Section 107 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 are to be filed before the appellate authority. As such the petitioner cannot be so hurry and invoke writ remedy […]
Multiple independent residential units in same building can be treated as one residential unit for section 54F Exemption and usage of the property has to be considered in determining whether it is a residential property or a commercial property
Kerala High Court cancelled the GST registration of the Appellant since they have not deposited the payment of Central Goods and Services Tax(CGST) and also the State Goods and Services Tax (SGST) from year 2017 onwards till the date of hearing.
Mangla Hoist P. Ltd. Vs Union of India (Delhi High Court) Admittedly, the judgment in Brand Equity Treaties Limited (supra), has not been stayed so far and therefore, the respondents are under an obligation to abide by the directions issued therein by adequately publicising the said decision and uploading it on their website as also […]
Delhi High Court in its judgment pronounced today has held that judgment in Brand Equity will continue to apply in-spite of retrospective amendment to Section 140 by The Finance (Amendment) Act, 2020.
High Court states that so long as functions of the computers are performed with other functions and other functions are dependant on the functions of the computer, ATMs are to be treated as computers and are entitled to higher rate of depreciation.
CIT Vs NCR Corporation Pvt Ltd (Karnataka High Court) Whether the tribunal is correct on facts and in law in holding that ATMs and encoders are computers eligible for 60% depreciation even when they do not provide processing activity and do not contain all features of computers and such cannot be called as computers? It […]
In the present case, Assessee is engaged in the business of providing accommodation entries to entry seekers. During the assessement proceedings AO held that the identity of the parties involved in the transactions were not furnished as well as genuineness of the transactions relating to total cash deposits were not satisfactorily explained by the assessee.
