Jaitron Communication Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Of U. P. (Allahabad High Court) Admittedly, in the facts of the present case the petitioner did accept that the e-way bill with the vehicle did not contain correct description with regard to movement of goods. Another e-way bill (though not available with the vehicle, at the time of […]
Apeejay Infralogistics challenges denial of cost recovery charge (CRC) waiver by Customs for ICDs/CFSs. Get insights on regulatory disputes and cargo handling.
Same Deutzfahr India P Ltd Vs State of Telangana (Telangana High Court) Once it is clear that petitioner has additional place of business in the State of Telangana in Bongulur village, Ibrahimpatnam Mandal and the goods were being transported to that address from its Corporate office at Ranipet, Tamil Nadu State, it cannot be said […]
Telangana High Court rules in favor of Deutzfahr India. Unjust GST and penalty collection revoked. Key insights into the case explained.
Arpit Parcel Service Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) 1. Heard Mr. Ashish B. Desai, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Dharmesh Devnani, learned AGP for respondent State. 2. By way of this petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the impugned notice dated 08.08.2020 in Form […]
Commissioner of GST Vs Checkpoint Apparel Labeling Solutions India Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) We are constrained to observe that the Revenue Department, cannot be permitted to file such frivolous appeals by way of intra court appeals. The documents discussed above and quoted by us clearly establish beyond doubt that the Assessee had been making […]
Nitin Singh Bhati Vs. Union of India (Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench) The petitioner before this court a practicing advocate has filed this present petition by way of Public Interest Litigation. The contention of the petitioner is that a criminal case was registered against certain persons in the township of Indore i.e. Crime No. […]
Ravi Dixit Vs State of U.P. and Another (Allahabad High Court) Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the summoning order is without compliance of provisions of Section 138 of the Act, 1881; the application has been falsely implicated due to enmity and financial dispute with the complainant and that cheques were dishonoured as […]
Goyal Iron And Steel Traders Vs Assistant Commissioner Palam Division CGST Delhi South & Ors. (Delhi High Court) High Court directed to decide the matter by way of a reasoned order where the electronic credit ledger was blocked citing a mismatch in the Input Tax Credit claimed in GSTR-3B and that appearing in GSTR-2A. High COurt held that […]
CIT Vs. City Lubricants Pvt. Ltd (Madras High Court) Thus, the issue pertaining to the amount of advance received by the assessee, namely, Rs.9 Crores was never the subject matter of the reopening proceedings which is sufficient to hold that the assessment order dated 25.03.2015 to be a nullity. Nevertheless, we heard the learned counsels […]
