Mohammed Aslam Son of Abdul Rashid Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) Under Section 15(I)(a)(iiia) of the Act of 1967, the smuggling of gold with intent to threaten or likely to threaten the economic security of the country is very much covered under the smuggling of “any other material” Thus, the contention of the […]
Universal Dyechem Private Limited Vs Union of India (Gujarat High Court) Once the show-cause notice is issued to the party concerned, the documents/records, which have not been relied upon, should be returned to the party. This is what even is suggested in the master circular dated 19.01.2017 which has been referred to in the representation. […]
Dharti Quarry Works Vs State of Gujarat (Gujarat High Court) We are of the view that there is no legal justification for withholding the amount referred to above, which is otherwise refundable to the writ applicants in passing of any assessment orders for the relevant assessment years. It could be said that such withholding of the refund is contrary […]
Documents/records which are not relied upon in the show-cause notice, are required to be returned under proper receipt to the person from whom those are seized.
Saurashtra Ferrous Pvt. Ltd. Vs State Tax Officer (Gujarat High Court) It is an admitted fact that the respondents-authorities have not invoked the Section 39 of the GVAT Act, which provides the powers to withhold the refund in certain cases. After considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we are of the view that […]
Important Judgment of Gauhati High Court on interest on delayed refund of Excise duty under the excise exemption scheme. Under the said scheme exempted units have to first pay the excise duty which is to be refunded back after verification
Writ petition was maintainable despite the availability of an alternative remedy as the nature of challenge thrown in the writ petition was on the ground of absence of jurisdiction of Resolution Professional and the NCLT in IBC matters and not ‘wrongful exercise of the available jurisdiction’, thus bringing it within the fold of Article 226 of the Constitution.
The present petition inter-alia seeks quashing of the impugned Letters dated 31st December, 2020 whereby Respondents have directed the Bankers of the Petitioner Company to Freeze and/or Provisionally attach the bank accounts of the Petitioner Company
Genpact India Pvt. Ltd. Vs Union of India And Ors. (Punjab And Haryana High Court) The petitioner has straightway approached this Court, challenging the order dated 11.09.2020 of the Adjudicating Authority, vide which the refund claimed by the petitioner has been rejected. Having heard the counsel for the parties and on going through the pleadings […]
Torrent Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs State of Rajasthan & Vinay Mangal (Rajasthan High Court) The Court below was swayed by the fact that the purchases were made by bills and the payment was made in the account of the seller. The Court below failed to consider the provisions of Section 19 of the Act of 1940 […]
