Nayan Jayantilal Balu Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) Perusal of the complaint launched against Petitioner also disclose allegations that Petitioner failed to substantiate the claim of purchases amounting to Rs. 2,74,03,016/- and the assessing officer held the purchases to be bogus and made an addition of Rs. 34,25,377/(12.5% of the bogus purchases). On Appeal […]
Roop Lal and another Vs Suresh Kumar Yadav (Allahabad High Court) This is a claimants appeal, claiming enhancement of award for the death of a child who was 07 years of age at the time of his death. Learned counsel for the appellants has submitted that deceased was a brilliant student and he had very […]
Commissioner of Income Tax Vs SBI Life Insurance Company Ltd. (Bombay High Court) Therefore the obligation to deduct is on the person who is paying and the deduction to be made at the time of making such payment. Factually and admittedly no amount has been paid to the agents by respondent as a reimbursement of […]
Vikas Elastochem Agencies Private Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner Central Excise & GST (Madras High Court) No doubt, the petitioner was required to file GST Tran 1 with correct information. However, the Courts have taken note of the fact that there were difficulties in making proper declarations in Tran 1 at the initial phase of implementation […]
CIT Vs Manna Trust (Rajasthan High Court) The respondent Trust is a registered charitable trust. The assessing officer for the assessment year 2016-17 accepted the return filed by the trust and granted exemption as applicable under law. The Commissioner, Income-Tax took the said order in revision under Section 263 of the Act and held that […]
Dharamraj Vs ITO (Delhi High Court) Learned counsel for the respondent submits that notice under Section 148 of the Act was issued at the same address of the Assessee which is available in the ITD data base. The said notice was duly served as it was never received back by the Thereafter, notice under Section […]
High Court observed that in the absence of specific mention of IGST and Compensation Cess in the Exemption Notification, only the BCD on the fair cost of repair charges, freight and insurance charges would be payable. The IGST and Compensation Cess would be wholly exempted. Therefore, the assessee could not be denied such exemption on reimport of repaired air-crafts and spare parts.
K.P. Muhammed Ashraf Vs Taliparamba Municipality (Kerala High Court) The petitioner, who is owner in possession of a building in Taliparamba Municipality, seeks to declare that Rule 9(4A) and Rule 9(4C) of the Kerala Municipality (Property Tax, Service Tax and Surcharge) Rules, 2011 which prescribes fixation of Property Tax at a minimum of 25% over […]
Union of India Vs State of Kerala (Kerala High Court) It is true that even while dismissing the application submitted by the petitioner herein, the learned Magistrate ordered to retain 30% of the amount for securing the interest of the Income Tax Department. Apparently, an amount of 30% was fixed under the impression that the […]
Rohit Berlia Vs The Intelligence Officer (Orissa High Court) In the instant case, the petitioner was arrested on 08.2021 for an offence punishable under Section 132(1)(c) CGST Act, 2017 having availed fake ITC by the firm M/s. Arshee Ventures during the period from July, 2017 to March, 2019. As is made to understand, the business […]
