Explore the legal intricacies of V. Krishnamurthy vs. Diary Classic Ice Creams in Karnataka High Court. Analysis of interim compensation order under Section 143A of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
HC held that interest component of Equated Monthly Instalments (EMI) of loan, through credit card services by a bank, attracts payment of GST
Order for grant of suspension of sentence or bail were all interlocutory orders and were not revisable under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
HC directed the respondents to open the portal to file, revise or re-revise TRAN 1 return, if it is possible or feasible.
Ernst And Young U.S. LLP Vs ACIT (Delhi High Court) Court is of the view that the Petitioner-Assessee has a right to get adequate time in accordance with the Act to submit its reply. Section 148A(b) permits the Assessing Officer to suo moto provide up to thirty days period to an assessee to respond to […]
Gulam Deen Vs State of Punjab (Punjab & Haryana High Court) This Court has taken note of the judgements cited on behalf of the petitioners and also the fact that the girl in the instant case i.e. petitioner No.2 is aged more than 16 years. In the case of Yunus Khan vs. State of Haryana […]
Gopi Kishan S/o Shri Chagan Lal Vs State Of Rajasthan (Rajasthan High Court) The case of petitioner-Rani Dan, Advocate, when seen in light of the precedential backdrop, and more particularly when it is apparent on the face of the record that the role of the said petitioner, in the present case, was exercised only as […]
It was submitted by appellant that as per the provisions of Section 20(2) of the Right to Information Act, 2005 (RTI Act) the record of the deceased petitioner, which has been illegally destroyed, appropriate penalty may be imposed upon the respondent.
Mandatory requirement of pre-show cause notice consultation, as embedded in Rule 142 (1A) of the Central Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 – Voluntary statement cannot substitute pre-show cause notice consultation
Halliburton Offshore Services Inc. Vs Union of India (Bombay High Court) The word ‘case”’ used in Section 127-B of the Customs Act, 1962 is defined u/s 127-A(b) to mean any proceeding under this Act or any other Act for the levy, assessment and collection of customs duty, pending before an adjudicating authority on the date […]
