Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Bapuji Murugesan Vs Mythili Rajagopalan  (Madras High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Bapuji Murugesan Vs Mythili Rajagopalan  (Madras High Court)

Conclusion: Order for grant of suspension of sentence or bail were all interlocutory orders and were not revisable under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Held: In the instant case, assessee contended that order of deposit under Section 148 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was mandatory and that the deposit was with respect to 20% of the compensation/fine amount and not the cheque

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31