Shree Basant Bhandar Int Udyog Vs Union of India (Rajasthan High Court) This bunch of writ petitions primarily involves the issue of permissibility of raising demand of GST on royalty. The petitioners in these petitions have challenged the notifications whereby, royalty paid by them on mining activity is being subjected to GST and/or notices issued […]
Santosh Kumar Gupta Vs Assistant Commissioner of Revenue (Calcutta High Court) The Hon’ble Division Bench of High Court at Calcutta set a side an order passed by the Learned Single Bench of Calcutta High Court by quashing the assessment order passed by the WBGST Authority and remanded the same to the Authority concern on account […]
A notice was given on the website, which is not sufficient, and a personal notice has to be given before cancellation of the GST registration. Therefore, the Court can invoke its jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution.
Held that as the agreement between the parties provided for a ‘non-binding’ arbitration, there was absolutely no intention of the parties to enter into an arbitration agreement and that the said agreement could not be termed as an arbitration agreement.
HC Held that the provisional attachment of the bank account is not maintainable once search under Section 67 has been concluded and the department is said to be in the process of proceedings to take Section 74 of the CGST Act.
Power of RBI to withhold remittance to be made under Automatic route to Wholly owned Subsidiary cannot be used to reject the remittance on whimsical and arbitrary reasons.
HC held that No restriction can be inferred on the powers of CBIC while appointing officers of DGCEI presently Directorate of GST Intelligence to act as Central Excise Officers.
Garikapati Venkateswara Rao W/o. Chenchaia Vs Union of India (Telangana High Court) It was not in dispute that GVR Infra Projects Limited had taken loan of Rs.250.03 Crores from the erstwhile Vijaya Bank which was now merged with Bank of Baroda, Respondent Nos.7 and 8 herein. It was also not disputed by the petitioner that […]
Vimlesh Bansal Vs Ashok Kumar (Rajasthan High Court) The legal maxim ‘Vigilantibus Non Dormientibus Jura Subveniunt’ literally translates to ‘the law assists only those who are vigilant and not those who sleep over their rights’. The said legal maxim applies squarely to the present case where applicants did not take recourse of law available to […]
Culver Max Entertainment Private Limited Vs F1.mylivecricket.live and Ors (Delhi High Court) Defendants No. 1 to 39 are said to be rogue infringing websites engaged in the business of uploading pirated and unlicensed content. Among the various illegal acts done by them is the live streaming of various sporting events. Unauthorized communication/ broadcast to public […]
