Bestpay Solutions Private Limited Vs Razorpay Software Private Limited (Karnataka High Court) 1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for the following reliefs:- “A. Pass An Order U/S 11(6) of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 appointing a sole arbitrator as per agreement dated entered on dated: 18/11/2020 to the Arbitration and Conciliation Centre, […]
Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, as per which, a presumption is raised in favour of the complainant that the notice had, in fact, been delivered.
There is no dispute that petitioners deposited taxes, however, the mistake which petitioners have committed is that they deposited tax under minor head ‘200’ instead of ‘400’.
Basudev Mittal Vs Union of India (Chhattisgarh High Court) It is alleged that the applicant has illegally availed Input Tax Credit of more than Rs.5,00,00,000/- by purchasing the goods from several suspicious and fake suppliers whose registration had already been cancelled. During search, it also came to the forefront that more than 700 vehicles, against […]
Jinesh Associates Vs Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Karnataka High Court) Proviso to Section 29(2) of Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act specifically observes that there shall be no cancellation of GST registration without giving an opportunity of being heard. Accordingly, during the course of proceedings relating to cancellation of registration, there is a statutory mandate […]
Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar Vs Laxmikant Govind Joshi (Bombay High Court) Held that the provisions of section 143-A of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 are directory and not mandatory as a discretion was conferred upon the Court, to either grant or not to grant interim compensation. Facts- The respondent/Complainant filed proceedings u/s. 138 of NI Act, […]
Golden Goenka Commerce Pvt. Ltd Vs PCIT (Calcutta High Court) By these writ petitions, petitioners have challenged the impugned orders of transfer of petitioners’ income tax file from Kolkata to Lucknow under Section 127(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. It is the case of the petitioner that before passing the impugned order of transfer […]
HC held that GST Assessment order passed without issuing SCN for the period of Assessment is invalid & criticized Assessing Officer for half-baked, incomplete and internet acquired knowledge and for not following principle of natural justice.
Held that intention of the parties to have their disputes arbitrated and that the same is paramount even where the dispute resolution clauses are vaguely worded or where there is an ambiguity in choice of the mechanism to be adopted.
Held that Government is vicariously liable for negligence on the part of the Government hospital. Court ordered lumpsum compensation of Rs. 5 Lakhs payable to the petitioner.
