It was wrongly noted that the Assessee has not filed any return of income, when in fact Assessee had filed its return. It was further wrongly noted that the Assessee has not preferred appeal against the assessment order when in fact the Petitioner had filed the aforementioned appeal.
K.Chiranjeevi Vs Union of India (Madras High Court) The Central Information Commission (in short ‘CIC’) in the case of Shir Milap Choraria V. Central Board of Direct Taxes (Appeal No.CIC/AT/2008/00628 dated 15.06.2009), was concerned with the request for disclosure of income tax returns and financials of a third party, and at paragraph 12, the Bench […]
Calcutta High Court held that computation of award amount without multiplying the amount with the multiplier 13 is unjustifiable.
Karnataka High Court in cancellation of GST registration held that sufficient time needs to be given for furnishing the documents, accordingly, order quashed with a direction to restore the proceedings for reconsideration by the department.
Bombay High Court dismissed PIL in absence of any absolute evidence or live link between the alleged malpractices in the B.M.C and private respondents.
Patna High Court held that non-constitution of Appellate tribunal deprives petitioner’s statutory right to appeal u/s. 112(8) and 1129(9) of Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (BGST).
Sri Laxmi Narayan Agency Vs ITO (Orissa High Court) On writ the assessee contended that the documents on the basis of which the Assessing Officer had formed the reason to believe that income had escaped assessment were not supplied to the assessee, and that the request for opportunity of cross-examination of the persons on the […]
Bombay High Court held that initiation of re-assessment proceedings in violation of the procedure prescribed under section 148A(b) of the Income Tax Act i.e. without supplying requisite material is bad in law and liable to be set aside.
GST order dated 3rd August, 2022 is quashed on the ground that the same has been issued in the name of a dead person.
Grievance of petitioner is that benefit of Section 11 of Income Tax Act has not been extended to petitioner, which is a Charitable Society. The reason stated is that they failed to submit audit reports in time.
