Detailed analysis of Gujarat High Court’s judgment in Bharatkumar Pravinkumar & Co. vs. State of Gujarat regarding seizure of cash under GST Act.
Madras High Court case highlights importance of complying with Rule 88C of the CGST Rules to effect recovery based on difference in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. Madras High Court allowed the writ petition in M/s. Caterpillar India Pvt. Ltd. v. The Assistant Commissioner Chennai, ruling that no recovery could be effected without complying with rule 88C of the CGST Rules.
Delhi High Court held that notice issued under section 143(2) of the Income Tax Act after the expiry of six months from the end of the financial year in which return is furnished is barred by limitation and hence unsustainable in law.
Kerala High Court held that as two authorities have concurrently held in favour of the petitioner and ordered release of the Gold and Currency, the same cannot be retained. Accordingly, confiscated gold and cash directed to be released.
Kerala High Court held that writ petition is misconceived and non-maintainable as petitioner didn’t co-operate for concluding the proceedings by the Tribunal on remand.
Customs department was directed to release fresh apples imported from New Zealand as the same were perishable in nature and were meant for human consumption, made the court find it appropriate to order the release of the goods, however, subject to the condition that Respondent should furnish a bank guarantee in order to safeguard the interests of the department.
In a recent Delhi High Court judgment, it was ruled that GST proceedings initiated by different authorities can be consolidated. Learn more about case and its implications.
Granting a short period of time to file a reply violates the legal right of an assessee. Learn about judgment of Madras High Court in case of M/s Health and Allied Insurance Company Ltd. v. Commissioner of State Tax, Chennai
Delhi High Court held that a mistake has been made in triggering reassessment proceedings against the petitioner as no impugned transactions have been carried out by the assessee and accordingly, re-assessment proceedings initiated u/s. 148 of the Income Tax Act is set aside.
Delhi High Court granted bail as prolonged incarceration of a person overrides the statutory restriction contained in Section 37(1)(b)(ii) of the Narcotics Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act).
