Himachal Pradesh High Court rules that POCSO cases can be quashed if the victim and accused reach a genuine compromise and lead a happy married life. Analyzing a recent judgment, explore the legal perspective on quashing FIRs under the POCSO Act based on reconciliation and matrimonial harmony.
Delhi High Court ruling on Grapes Digital Pvt. Ltd. vs. Principal Commissioner, allowing IGST refund for export of services and addressing interest on late payments.
Delhi High Court held that payments made under compelling circumstances during the course of search, without ascertaining tax liability and issuance of notice post search, is liable to be refunded back to the taxpayer along with interest.
Delhi High Court held that involuntary reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) during search needs to be refunded to the taxpayer while reserving the right of the GST authorities to proceed against the said taxpayer to the full extent in accordance with law.
Explore the Madras High Court’s decision in East Coast Constructions and Industries Ltd. vs. Assistant Commissioner, where it allowed a writ petition, highlighting technical issues on the GST portal. The court remanded the matter, emphasizing the need for a fair chance and directing the Revenue Department to address dashboard discrepancies.
Kerala High Court dismisses writ challenging income tax assessment by TDGSM Co-Op Society. Details on court’s decision, petitioner’s claims, and potential remedies explored.
Understand the tax treatment of interest on loans for share purchase when income from shares is classified as business income. Analysis of the Delhi High Court’s ruling in PCIT Vs Devata Tradelink Ltd
Read about Patna High Court’s decision in Mahavir Sharmik case, granting relief to a cooperative society from BGST for solid waste management activities.
While issuing a cryptic show cause notice, the authorities had violated the principles of natural justice. As from the impugned order as well as the show cause notice, the reasons for cancellation of GST registration were not decipherable therefrom, therefore, the show cause notice and the impugned order were quashed and set aside.
Form-10 under rule 17(2) for claiming exemption had been supplied to AO after the prescribed period but before completion of assessment, it ought to be considered by AO for granting benefit of exemption under Section 11(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 in original assessment proceedings. Accordingly, the entire process of reassessment that had been initiated by Department was without any legal basis whatsoever.
