Delhi High Court directs Income Tax Department to remit Rs 44.6 lakhs refund in the Syed Habeebur Rehman vs. DCIT Circle 28(1) & Ors. case, resolving a dispute over AYs 2010-11 and 2014-15. Full judgment details.
Delhi High Court rules in CIT Vs Vardhman Overseas Ltd. that non-payment to creditors, shown in balance sheets, doesn’t imply benefit under Section 41(1) IT Act, safeguarding the principle against double taxation benefits.
Delhi High Court held that upward adjustment advertising, marketing and promotion expenses (AMP) rejected as reimbursement of AMP expenses incurred by respondent (Sony India) on behalf of its AE was at arm’s length.
Kerala High Court held that bail application of petitioner involved in tax evasion of more than Rs. 6.5 crores on allegation of supply of goods without issuance of invoice rejected as such serious allegations needs thorough investigation.
Delhi High Court dismissed condonation of delay in filing of appeals by revenue in absence of any sufficient cause shown. Court observed that no action is taken against the officers who sit on files and do nothing under presumption that the court would condone delay in routine.
Delhi HC quashes GST search on Bhagat Ram Agro, cites errors in authorization and lack of statutory basis. Emphasizes the importance of legal adherence in GST proceedings.
Rajasthan High Court grants bail to Mohit Sharma in a case involving 73 fake firms and Rs. 73.54 Crore ITC transaction. Analysis of the legal proceedings and factors considered.
High Court held that provision contained in Section 16(4) of CGST Act is violative of neither Article 14 of Constitution nor Articles 19(1)(g) & 300A of Constitution
Patna High Court directs AO to reconsider interest charges in SYV Motors vs. State of Bihar under GST, citing retrospective amendment to Section 50.
Service of notice for cancellation of GST registration through e-portal only without physical means was not valid as assessee could not open the e- Portal, due to cancellation of their GST registration and the respondent could expect assessee to know of the issuance of show cause notice or any other communications which were sent through e-Portal.
