Impugned GST order dismissed petitioner’s reply as unsatisfactory and lacking substantial documents. court highlighted absence of any request for further details from petitioner, indicating a failure to engage with submitted reply effectively.
Detailed analysis of P.Jeyaraman Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) case where Madras HC orders disposal of application for Revocation of GST registration cancellation
Delhi High Court rules that an ex-parte order cannot stand if the taxpayer’s GSTN is cancelled, hindering response. Detailed analysis and implications discussed.
Read the full text of the judgment/order by Allahabad High Court regarding the unauthorized search and seizure in the case of Gaurav Saurav Traders.
Mahaveer NX challenges a customs order citing address discrepancy & lack of hearing. Madras HC sets it aside, directing issuance of SCN for correction.
Analysis of M. Kandasamy Vs Deputy State Tax Officer-2 case reveals how inadequate hearing led to unsustainability of order under CGST Act 2017.
Explore the case of Akshya Kumar Sahu v. Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise, where the Orrisa High Court directs the opening of the GST portal for filing returns. Learn about the conditions and implications.
Court observed that the petitioner had provided a detailed reply addressing each head of the Show Cause Notice. However, the impugned order merely stated that the reply was not satisfactory without providing any substantive reasoning or analysis. The Court held that this lack of consideration rendered the order unsustainable.
Bombay High Court ruling: Assessing Officer (AO) must record dissatisfaction with Assessee’s claim regarding expenditure. Detailed analysis of PCIT-2 Vs Tata Capital Ltd case.
Delhi High Court rules AO can’t deviate from Transfer Pricing Officer’s determined Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in international transactions, upholding assessee’s writ petition.
