Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : P.Jeyaraman Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)
Appeal Number : W.P. No. 9003 of 2024
Date of Judgement/Order : 03/04/2024
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

P.Jeyaraman Vs Assistant Commissioner (CT) (Madras High Court)

The case of P.Jeyaraman vs. Assistant Commissioner (CT), heard by the Madras High Court, concerns the cancellation of the petitioner’s GST registration allegedly abused by third parties.

The petitioner, registered under GST enactments, claimed that third parties abused his GST registration during the COVID-19 pandemic. The petitioner filed nil returns, but his consultant discovered the abuse upon logging into the portal. Alleging unawareness of the show cause notice preceding the cancellation order, the petitioner complained to the Cyber Crime Cell and applied for revocation, pending disposal.

The petitioner’s counsel argued the petitioner’s intent to resume business and the necessity of registration restoration for refund claims. The Government Advocate noted contradictory statements in the petitioner’s complaint and submission, highlighting the need for disposal of the revocation application.

The Madras High Court directed the second respondent to dispose of the petitioner’s revocation application within two months, granting the petitioner a reasonable opportunity.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
August 2024
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031