CESTAT Ahmedabad held that it is settled legal position that sub-contractor is liable to pay service tax even though main contractor has paid service tax on total value. Accordingly, service tax demand sustained.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruling in Akshar Travels v. C.C.E. & S.T.-Daman exempts school children transportation from service tax, citing educational body exclusion.
Examining the CESTAT Chandigarh order on Chanakya Communication’s appeal. The judgment pertains to Cenvat Credit claim rights linked to service tax payment.
CESTAT Ahmedabad quashes Service Tax demand on Green Logistics for hiring buses to MSRTC under ‘Rent a Cab Operator Service’.
Examine the verdict by CESTAT Chennai concerning Sri Saraswathi Propeller Works’ case against GST & Central Excise, focusing on excise duty on steel structures.
CESTAT Delhi upheld service tax demand for Manan Infra Development Pvt Ltd. Key insights on ‘Construction of Complex’ service tax evasion and more.
CESTAT Chennai upheld the quashing of Anti Dumping Duty (ADD) for imported Diethyl Thio Phosphoryl Chloride based on the Customs Tariff Act nuances.
CESTAT Chennai supports Dalmia Cement’s refund claim due to the Customs Department’s delay in reviewing orders, marking an important legal precedent.
CESTAT Hyderabad rules that no service tax is applicable on road repair, management, and maintenance services provided to NHAI from 2005-2009.
CESTAT Chennai held that Foreign Telecommunication Operator (FTO) is not the service receiver, but the visitors to India who use the service during their visit to India, are the service receiver and as per appellant’s own case the activity amounts to export of service and therefore, not exigible to Service Tax.
