CESTAT Chennai ruling on classifying magnesite collection as mining services. Analysis of KRSS Manpower Service vs. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise.
CESTAT Bangalore allows refund claims of unutilized CENVAT credit for input services related to the manufacture of finished goods. Read the detailed analysis.
CESTAT Kolkata sets aside demand of proportionate Cenvat Credit as the assessee reverses it with interest. Explore the full text of the CESTAT Kolkata order.
CESTAT Mumbai held that once the duty on final products has been accepted by the department, CENVAT credit availed need not be reversed even if the activity docs not amount to manufacture.
CESTAT Kolkata held that central excise duty exemption available under notification no. 108/95-CE dated 28.08.1995 as amended vide Notification No.13/2008-CE dated 01.03.2008 is allowable to appellant as motor vehicle chassis are cleared to the projects funded by International Organization.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that the subsequent service of the order copy to the appellant is the date of communication of the order-in-original to the appellant.
CESTAT Ahmedabad sets aside service tax demand on electrification services, ruling they do not qualify as works contract services. Read detailed case analysis.
In Lyka Labs Ltd. vs. C.C.E. & S.T., CESTAT Ahmedabad addresses the classification of Ayurvedic medicaments with non-active ingredients, setting legal precedence.
In the case of Gurjant Singh Beant Singh vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, CESTAT Chandigarh clarifies service tax threshold calculation and classification issues.
In Panihati Rubber Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Central Excise case, appellant self-reversed CENVAT credit during an audit, avoiding need for an SCN.
