CESTAT directed the customs department to deliver a certified copy of their final order to Vedanta Limited following proper procedures. This ensures Vedanta receives the order and can exercise their appeal rights.
CESTAT Chennai rules redemption fine cannot exceed market value in Vinayaga Traders vs Commissioner of Customs case, setting precedent for import disputes.
CESTAT Chennai dismisses Commissioner of Customs appeal, upholding Suguna Poultry Farm’s refund claim under section 26A of the Customs Act.
Enterprise Software Solutions Lab Vs Commissioner of Customs (CESTAT Bangalore) Introduction: The case of Enterprise Software Solutions Lab Ltd. vs. Commissioner of Customs, adjudicated by CESTAT Bangalore, revolves around the classification of T4 Fingerprint Time & Attendance System and K200 Proximity Time & Attendance System. The appellant, based in Bangalore, contested the assessing authority’s classification […]
Explore the CESTAT Bangalore ruling on business transfer agreements with non-compete clauses and the implications for Service Tax. Get insights into Naveen Chava Vs Commissioner of Central Tax case.
CESTAT Bangalore rules that Finger Print Readers, having individual functions, cannot be classified under the CTH of Computer Accessories. Read the full order here.
CESTAT Chennai sets aside revocation of Customs Broker license for Souparnika Shipping Services due to facilitating fraudulent import-export activities.
CESTAT Allahabad rules against service tax demand based solely on Form 26AS, emphasizing the need for thorough evidence beyond income tax returns.
CESTAT Chandigarh orders 12% annual interest on excise duty refunds for Fujikawa Power vs CCE & ST, setting a precedent for timely financial compensations.
CESTAT Kolkata rules no penalty on Rakesh Aggarwal without evidence of involvement in invalid BMW M5 importation. Detailed analysis and verdict explained.
