CESTAT Hyderabad rules that government tax claims are extinguished upon NCLT’s approval of a resolution plan, settling all disputes.
CESTAT Kolkata’s order regarding the penalty imposed on CHA M/s United Custom House Agency for their alleged role in improper export overvaluation.
CESTAT Hyderabad’s ruling on CENVAT credit reversal for a polyester spun yarn manufacturer and the use of Rule 6(3) in central excise regulations.
CESTAT Kolkata quashes penalty in a service tax case related to testing, inspection, and certification services due to a limitation issue.
CESTAT Kolkata dismisses an appeal as it was filed beyond the condonable period specified by Section 128 of the Customs Act. Learn more about the case.
CESTAT Bangalore’s recent decision on CENVAT credit for banking and financial services in property rentals. Detailed analysis and implications of the case.
CESTAT Delhi held that imposition of penalty under section 78 of the Finance Act without elements of fraud or collusion or willful mis-statement or suppression of facts or violation of Act or Rules made thereunder with an intent to evade payment of tax is untenable in law.
CESTAT Chandigarh held that duty demand valuing goods cleared to sister concern in term of rule 8 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 (CVR, 2000) without any reasonable justification and without providing report of Deputy Director (Cost) is unsustainable in law.
CESTAT Ahmedabad held that Nutritional Supplements classifiable under heading 2106 9099 fall under Serial No. 453 of Schedule III of the Notification 1/2017-IGST. Accordingly, IGST @18% is payable and not @28%. Accordingly, demand of differential custom duty unsustainable.
Learn about the dismissal of CESTAT appeals following the NCLT order in the case of Commissioner of Customs vs Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd.
