It is evident that an applicant can seek an Advance Ruling only in relation to supply of goods or services or both undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by them. Accordingly, the question on tax liability under reverse charge mechanism is not liable for admission before the authority of advance ruling.
In re KRBL Infrastructure Limited (AAR Uttar Pradesh) Que-(i) Whether the applicant is eligible to take input tax credit in relation to expenditure incurred for ‘Civil and Interior Works’ in building located at C32, Sector-62,Noida, Gautam Buddha Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, 201301 at different floors, since the said property is further used for letting out to different […]
In re Broadcast Engineering Consultants India Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) As per Section 2 (31) of CGST Act, 2017 ‘consideration’ includes any payment made or to be made, whether in money or otherwise, in respect of, in response to, or for the inducement of, the supply of goods or services or both, whether by […]
In re Prag Polymers (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 Classification of Coach Work like Switch Board Cabinet For Railways Coaches and Locomotives? Ans- Switch Board Cabinet merits Classification under HSN 8537. AAAR Order: Switch Board Cabinet as per specific design for Railway falls under Chapter Heading 8607 FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE […]
In re Vardhman Infotech (Trade Name), Neelam Singh (Legal Name) (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) The applicant has sought advance ruling on GST on supply of OMR Sheets, Answer Sheets/Examination Copies Printed with logo and name of educational Institution/University and it is obvious that said supply has been made by using the physical input including paper […]
In re Concord Control Systems Private Limited (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 What will be the HSN Code and GST Rate on Supply of Bellow Duct to RDSO Ministry of Railways for use in Indian Railways Coaches? Ans- “Bellow Ducts” merits Classification under HSN 8424 Attracting GST @ 18% (CGST 9% &SGST 9%) Q-2 Whether […]
In re Jayesh A Dalal (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) AAR observe that the applicant has not submitted any relevant document to establish the coverage of services provided by them in particular functions entrusted to a municipality under the twelfth Schedule to Article 243W of the Constitution. The nature of services mentioned in the Work Order […]
In re Shyarn Sundar Sharma (GST AAR Uttar Pradesh) Q-1 What should be the Classification and GST rate on Supply of popcorn under Notification No. 01/2017 – Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 amended till date? Ans- The HSN code of the product namely ‘Popcorn’ is 19041090 Attracting Rate of Tax @9% each under Central and […]
Fabrication of tank from steel plates supplied free of cost from M/s IOCL is manufacture as per CGST Act, 2017. Accordingly, supply of tanks by the applicant is supply of goods.
Will builder be entitled to GST refund if amount is not Adjustable from future liability of GST under the project? The Question is out of purview of advance ruling authority. however, Whether the Applicant is entitled for refund or not, under Section 54 of Central Goods & Services Tax Act,2017 read with Rule 89 of Central Goods& Services Tax Rules, 2017 would be decided by the jurisdictional Authority subject to fulfillment of necessary conditions of refund.
