In re Geetastar Resorts Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Rajasthan) Whether Input Tax Credit on goods and services used in construction of hotel will be available to the applicant engaged in providing taxable services of hotel accomodation and related services? Since the applicant has withdrawn the application, therefore, no ruling is given. FULL TEXT OF ORDER […]
The services provided by the supplier are not in the nature of services provided by Tour Operator, the said supply of services cannot be classified under SAC 9985(i) of Notification No. 11/2017 Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017.
In re K M Trans Logistics Private Limited (GST AAAR Rajasthan) The appellant/applicant, vide its application dated 12.06.2019 filed before the Rajasthan Authority for Advance Ruling, had stated that the appellant is a service provider having its registered office at Jaipur, Rajasthan, and providing transport services to various manufacturers of motor vehicles for carrying their […]
In re K M Trans Logistics Private Limited (GST AAAR Rajasthan) Appellant is claiming on its official website (www.kmtrans.in) that they are serving about 90% of car makers viz. Maruti Suzuki, Toyota, Tata, Hyundai, Mahindra etc., are having Fleet Size of 1250, 35 branch offices, 32 loading stations, 80 service support. From this, it is clear […]
In re Chandmal Narayandas Consortium (GST AAR Rajasthan) The rate of GST on fee collected for entry into Subhash Udhyan (Municipal Park), ticket charges for Toy Train facility and ticket charges for Pedal Boat facility provided in Subhash Udhyan is @18% (SGST 9% +CGST 9%). FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, RAJASTHAN […]
In re Indag Rubber Limited (GST AAR Rajasthan) Q. Whether the applicant is eligible to claim credit of the GST charged by vendor at the time of supply of goods and services to it, which are used for carrying out the following activities for setting up of MRO facility which will be rented out: a. […]
Contention of the applicant that there is no asset transfer, has been resolved by the RRVPNL by issuing corrigendum dated 24.09.2019. After issue of the said corrigendum the question raised by the applicant turned redundant and therefore no advance ruling is required to be given.
The applicant has raised a question, whether separate registration is required in the State of Karnataka for the work contract awarded to him in the State of Karnataka? In this regard we observe that the question raised by the applicant is outside the purview of this authority. The authority for Advance Ruling is created under SGST/UTSGST Act and thus ruling pronounced are applicable within the particular state only, it is for this reason that questions relating to requirement of GST registration in another state is beyond the jurisdiction of this authority and hence no ruling can be given.
In re M/s Ashok Kumar Choudhary (GST AAR Rajasthan) What shall be rate of GST on activity of sub-contract for earthwork in relation to construction of access controlled Nagpur-Mumbai Super Communication Expressway (Maharashtra Samruddhi Mahamarg)? We find that the activity carried out by the applicant does not involve supply of goods whatsoever in any manner […]
In re M/s K M Trans Logistics Private Limited (GST AAR Rajasthan) 1. Does Transportation by own vehicles on the basis of Invoice(s) and E-way Bill without issuing the LR/GR by the Applicant Transporter will covered under exempted supply/non GST supply? To issue an E-way bill, it is mandatory to mention the transport document number […]
