AAR, Odisha objected that in addition to procedural part, there should be specific job work agreement and job work charges should be clearly mentioned and raised in their invoices.
In re Konkan Railway Corporation Limited (GST AAR Odisha) Whether separate registration is required in Odisha state? If yes, whether E-tender document/LOA would suffice as address proof since nothing else is with the Applicant and service recipient will not provide any other proof? Ans: Yes, the Applicant having its principal place of business in Maharashtra […]
AAR hold that Steel Authority of India Ltd., SAIL is a ‘Government Entity’, therefore the tax rate applicable to value of contract (works contract service only) between the Applicant and M/s SAIL is leviable at 12% [CGST @ 6% + SGST 6%]
In re NBCC (India) Limited (GST AAAR Odisha) With respect to issue raised in Para 3.6(a) whether the tax rate of 12% determined by the Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling in its order dated 19-03-2021 is applicable to entire contract, we find that there is no merit to discuss the matter again and again. The […]
In re Shreejikrupa Project Limited (GST AAR Odisha) Issued Raised (a) Whether the works contract service of construction of IIT Bhubaneswar Campus allotted to the applicant company under the sub contract basis, covered under clause (ix) of Sr. No. 3 (classification code 9954) of the table in the Notification No. 11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28 […]
In re M/s. IOCL (GST AAR Odisha) On perusal of the documents and submissions submitted by the applicant, it is seen that the applicant has entered into an agreement with M/s Praxair for construction of Hydrogen and Nitrogen Gas Plant inside the applicants premises at Paradip. Pursuant thereto, M/s Praxair had constructed, installed and successfully […]
In re NBCC (INDIA) Limited (GST AAR Odisha) The applicant in clause (a) [ as above) has discussed the findings of the Appellate Authority to: advance Ruling in its order no. 02/ODISHA-AAAR/Appeal/2020-21 dated 19.03.2021. In question no. (b), the applicant has sought clarification i.e. whether the classification and rate of taxes so determined by the […]
In Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Vs. M/s. Pioneer Bakers (GST AAAR Odisha) During the P.H., the Jurisdictional Officer, Sri Goutam Kumar Biswas(Appellant), Asst. Commissioner, CGST, Sambalpur-I Division stated that the applicant is running a bakery business, where different items likes cakes, bakery items, ice creams, chocolates, drinks & other eatable products are sold […]
AAR Ruled that A two or three-wheeled battery powered electric vehicle when supplied with or without battery pack is classifiable under HSN 8703 as an ‘electrically operated vehicle’ and is taxable @ 5% GST.
AAAR observed that is it clearly stated in the agreement between the Appellant and IIT Bhubaneswar that the Appellant is entrusted with the entire project on turnkey basis for work relating to Planning, designing, and supervision of construction of various building infrastructure development and interior work, etc.
