CESTAT held that, escalated value received under a contract for service of construction of road during GST regime, shall be added to the original contract value and the actual transaction value should be considered for payment of tax.
In re Worley Services India Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the services provided by the Applicant are classified under SI. No. 24(ii) of heading 9986 of the Rate Notification as ‘Support services to exploration, mining or drilling of petroleum crude or natural gas or both’ under SAC 998621 and attracts GST @ 12% […]
In re Navratna Shipping Pvt. Ltd (GST AAR Maharashtra) From a perusal of the submissions made by the applicant, it is clear that the impugned supply, in respect of which the subject question is raised, has already been completed before the date of filing of the subject application and therefore it can be said that the […]
The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s. HINDOOSTAN MILLS LIMITED, vide reference ARA No. 88 Dated 31.03.2022 is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally.
In re Shri Venkateshwara Infrastructure J V (GST AAR Maharashtra) AAR find that the Central railway Department, which has given the impugned work to the applicant, can be termed as Central Government. The status of Railways is that of Government only but it is a business entity. Hence, we find that, in the subject case, […]
In re Lloyds Register Consulting Energy Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Whether the project management consultancy services provided by the applicant to Vedanta Limited (Division: Cairn Oil & Gas) would be liable to GST at the rate of 12% from January 2018 under serial no. 21(ia) i.e. under Service Accounting Code (“SAC”) 9983 […]
In re Precision Camshafts Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question: – Whether the activity of design and development of patterns used for manufacturing of camshafts, for a customer is a composite supply, the principal supply being supply of services? Answer :- The activity of design and development of patterns used for manufacturing of camshafts, for a customer is […]
In re Maharashtra Ex-Servicemen Corporation Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether the Chapter No. 99, Sr. No. 3 of the Exemption Notification No. 12/2017 is applicable to MESCO Ltd. for the pure services i.e. Security Services rendered to various sites of Municipal Corporations in relation to functions entrusted to it under Article 243 W of the […]
Forest Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) We observe that, the land belongs to the MSFR Department who is the owner. As an owner, MSFR Department has leased the land to the applicant. The applicant is not the owner of the land. Now, the MSFR Department has asked the applicant to hand over […]
In re Shah Sakalchand Chunilal & Co (Hitesh P. Jain) (GST AAR Maharashtra) The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s SHAH SAKALCHAND CHUNILAL & CO, vide reference ARA No. 75 Dated 11.03.2022 is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally. FULL TEXT OF THE ORDER OF AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, MAHARASHTRA […]
