Whether the procedure to raise the invoice from Mumbai Office for imports received at Paradip Port, Odisha where we do not have any separate GST Registration and Charge IGST from Mumbai to our Customers is correct? or do we have to take separate Registration in the State of Odisha for the below mentioned transactions?
This question pertains to formulae for calculation of refund and hence does not fall within the purview of Section 97 of the CGST Act and is therefore not answered.
In re Sanofi India Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether input tax credit is available of the GST paid on expenses incurred towards promotional schemes of Shubh Labh Loyalty Program? if we accept the contention of the applicant that the promotional items are supplied as a contractual obligation e.g. watch is given under the contractual obligation […]
Accordingly, it is believed that under the GST Law, the intent or objective of any club or association is immaterial in so far as the leviability of GST is concerned. Therefore, provision by club, association, society, or any such body (for a subscription or any other consideration) of the facilities or benefits to its members will surely attract GST irrespective of the fact that such club is not set up with the objective of providing any goods or service to its members.
In re Gandhar Oil Refinery (India) Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- Whether the applicant requires registration in each State separately? Answer :- In the present case as mentioned above the place of supply is the location of the importer who is situated in the State of Maharashtra and hence the applicant will be clearing […]
In re City And Industrial Development Corporation of Maharashtra Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question (1) Whether the supply of services by the applicant, of ‘transfer by way of lease’ of vacant plots of ‘Maharashtra State Government owned lands’ or ‘privately owned lands acquired under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 by the Maharashtra State Government’ vested […]
In re Kolte Patil Developers Ltd. (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling upheld the ruling given by the Advance Ruling Authority by observing that since the Appellant has raised questions on the admissibility of the credit of the service tax and VAT paid under the pre-GST regime, it is held that neither […]
In re Jalaram Feeds (GST AAR Maharashtra) Applicant has stated that they require services of Goods Transport Agency like any other business. Applicant being a recipient of supply is liable to pay tax under reverse charge basis and as per Section 9(4) of the Act, all the provisions of this act shall apply to such […]
In re Sabre Travel Network India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling held that the entire gamut of activities of the Appellant is in the nature of the composite supply, of which intermediary services is the principal supply. Further, as regards the services provided by the Appellant to their Client, […]
In re Crown Beers India Private Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) It is worth noting here that in erstwhile Service Tax regime also, the said activities of CBUs of manufacturing alcoholic liquor on behalf of Brand Owners (BOs) against a consideration, were subjected to Service Tax and this was clarified also by CBIC (earlier CBEC) vide […]
