In re Shital Tukaram Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- In the instant case, whether the services provided by us to Samaj Kalyan Department, State Government of Maharashtra (Social Welfare Department) for residential accommodation of underprivileged girls is exempt from GST? Answer: Answered in the negative. Question 2:- Whether TDS provisions will be applicable in […]
In re Tukaram Pundalik Borade (GST AAR Maharashtra) The applicant has submitted that the Samaj kalyan Vibhag of the Government of Maharashtra has taken the immovable property on rent from the applicant to house the girls from the backward class communities which can be considered as a welfare measure undertaken by the Government for the […]
In re Vishal Cooperative Housing Society Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) According to circular number 109/28/2019-GST dated 22 July 2019 RWAs are entitled to take ITC on GST paid by them on capital goods (generators, water pumps, lawn furniture etc.), goods (taps, pipes, other sanitary and hardware fittings etc.) and input services such as repair and […]
The Application in GST ARA Form No. 01 of M/s. Rotary Club of Bombay Sea Face, vide reference ARA No. 15 dated 02.09.2020 is disposed of, as being withdrawn voluntarily and unconditionally
In re Geetee Tours Private Limited (GST AAR Maharashtra) Whether Toyota Innova Or Equivalent Vehicles (6 Seater) registered in Tourist category with All India Tourist Permit provided for carrying Covid 19 patients for Medical Treatment would be considered as Taxable Services Or Exempted Services? We find that even though the applicant has submitted that the […]
In re Deccan Wheels (GST AAR Maharashtra) Maharashtra AAR rule that ITC can’t be claimed on indirect expenses when dealer is engaged in selling of second hand goods Maharashtra Authority for Advance Ruling (Mah AAR) ruled that Input Tax Credit cannot be claimed on Indirect Expenses like rent, commission, professional fees, telephone incurred for purpose […]
In re Godavari Marathwada Irrigation Development Corporation (GST AAR Maharashtra) Section 95 of the CGST Act, 2017 allows Advance Ruling authority to decide the matter in respect of supply of goods or services or both, undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the applicant. We find that the applicant has not undertaken the supply in […]
In re Hotel OM Tunga Vihar (GST AAR Maharashtra) The applicant has submitted a email letter dated 21.10.2021 and requested that they may be allowed to voluntarily withdraw their subject application filed on 31.12.2019. The request of the applicant to withdraw the application voluntarily and unconditionally is hereby allowed, without going into the merits or […]
In re S.B. Reshellers Pvt.Ltd. (GST AAR Maharashtra) Question 1:- The activity of reshelling of old sugar mill rollers whether is treatable as a job work service under SAC 9988 or is treatable as a repair/maintenance service under SAC 9987? Answer: – The activity of reshelling of old sugar mill rollers is treatable as a repair/maintenance service […]
Mah AAR rejected the subject application as being non-maintainable as per Section 95 of the CGST Act because the Applicant has firstly raised questions as a recipient of services and secondly the questions are in respect of past and completed supply as on the date of the application and not a supply, which is being undertaken/proposed to be undertaken.
