In re Testmesures Spherea Solutions Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) The Karnataka Authority of Advance Ruling (“the KAAR”) in Re: M/s Testmesures Spherea Solutions Private Limited [KAR ADRG 46/2022 dated December 2, 2022] denied to grant Goods and Service Tax (“GST”) concession as the service of supply of test bunch equipment does not amounts to […]
Reimbursement of expenses at actual cost which are incurred by the employee staffs on behalf of Company is not liable to tax since the same is covered under Clause 1 of the Schedule III of CGST Act 2017.
In re KBL SPML JV (GST AAR Karnataka) In the instant case the questions, on which the applicant seeks advance ruling, are not in relation to the supply of goods or services or both being undertaken or proposed to be undertaken by the said applicant, but in relation to a completed supply, provided by them. […]
In re Mean Light Co (GST AAR Karnataka) In the instant case, the impugned products, as per the applicant, are woven fabrics having width less than 30 cm; Taffeta rolls made up of polyester yarn with acrylic coating to protect from raveling or fraying and also to have better printing quality; Satin rolls made up […]
Whether Input Tax Credit (ITC) of the GST charged by the Service Provider would be eligible for availment to the Applicant? Applicant not eligible to avail Input Tax Credit of ST paid on manpower supply services used for providing canteen facility.
In re Sivantos India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Karnataka) AAAR held that Since the parts and accessories of hearing aids falling under tariff item 9021 90 10 are not specifically mentioned in any of the entries of the exemption notification No 02/2017 Central Tax (Rate) and are also not specifically mentioned in either Schedule I, […]
AAAR set aside order of AAR for failure in giving a ruling on question of taxability under GST on services provided by assessee on the grounds that it involves determination of place of supply which is beyond its jurisdiction. Held that, the AAR was incorrect for failing to make a ruling on the matter. Further, remanded back the case to the AAR for fresh consideration.
Applicant stated that they wish to withdraw their application for advance ruling in view of recent GST council meetings and notifications issued thereafter. Application filed by Applicant for advance ruling is disposed-off as withdrawn.
In re Attica Gold Private Limited (GST AAR Karnataka) Q1. Whether Applicant who is under Marginal Scheme can claim Input Tax Credit on the expenses like Rent, advertisement expenses, commission, Professional expenses and other like expenses? Applicant who is under Marginal Scheme can claim Input Tax Credit on the expenses like Rent, Advertisement expenses, commission, […]
AAR ruled that, if the assessee qualifies to be a pure agent then reimbursement of tree cut compensation paid to farmers and land owners during the course of execution of work is not chargeable to GST
