No GST is applicable on salary deducted in lieu of notice period from the full and final settlement of the employees leaving the company without completing or serving the complete notice period as specified in the appointment letter.
AAR held that based on the information submitted by the applicant, the proposed product StrataTex HSR® would be classifiable under Tariff Item (TI) No. 59119032 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 however subject to the condition that they have been granted BIS certification in terms of amendment in Customs Tariff Act, 1975 as per 3rd Schedule (Sr. No. 43(vi)) read with section 98 of Finance Act, 2022.
The supply of applicant of Kandi ravo’ is classifiable under 24013000. The applicant is liable to pay GST at 28% [14 % CGST and 14 % SGST] in terms of notification No. 1/2017-CT(Rate), Sr. No. 13 of Schedule IV subject to the condition that goods are cleared without brand name.
In re Colourband Dyestuff P Ltd (GST AAR Gujarat) Colourband Dyestuff P Ltd, a dye manufacturing company, has filed an application seeking an advance ruling on the eligibility of input tax credit (ITC) for the works contract services and materials used for the foundation and structural supports of their machinery. The applicant argues that the […]
In re Nandini Ashram Trust (GST AAR Gujarat) Brief facts: Nandini Ashram Trust, 207, Sakar 5, B/h Natraj Cinema, Ashram Road, Ahmedabad, Gujarat 380 009 [for short -‘applicant’] is registered under GST and their GSTIN is 24AAATN8773B2ZL. 2. The applicant is engaged in providing a wide range of professional consulting services viz architecture, engineering (MEPF), […]
‘Architectural Consultancy Service’ provided by the applicant to Surat Municipal Corporation [SMC] for construction of SMIMER Hospital & College Campus is covered under entry no. 3 of notification No. 12/2017-Central (Rate) dated 28.6.2017 & thus is exempt from GST.
In re Kalepsh Dineshbhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) The aforementioned application having been filed by M/s. Kalpesh Dineshbhai Patel and not by M/s. Khanepe Hungermall LLP who is the actual supplier and also having been filed without requisite fee, stands rejected in terms of section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with sections 95(a), (c) […]
One time premium received by applicant on allotment of completed commercial units/building is taxable supply in terms of section 7 of CGST/GGST Act, 2017.
Subsidized deduction made by applicant from employees who are availing food in factory/corporate office would not be considered as a ‘supply’ under section 7 of CGST Act, 2017
AAR find that [a] applicant before us is not supplier of service and [b] that ruling sought is not for admissibility of input tax credit in respect of supply received by applicant. In fact it is the supplier who may seek an advance ruling in the matter.
