In re Mohitkumar Mahendrabhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) We, therefore, find that the applicant has neither filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 nor paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/-as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the […]
In re M/s. Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) We, therefore, find that the applicant has not paid the fees of Rs.10,000/- under the proper head i.e. ‘CGST’ and ‘GGST’ as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules where as paid fees of Rs. 10,000/- under “IGST” head. Therefore, the instant […]
In re Gujarat State Road Development Corporation ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required, they have not filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section […]
In re Ashokkumar Khimjibhai Patel (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01, they have not paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST […]
In re Abdulwahid Shamsudin Malik (GST AAR Gujarat) Although the applicant has filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01, they have not paid the fees of 10,000/- as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 […]
In re Ananta Synthetic Innovations (GST AAR Gujarat) The classification of the product manufactured and supplied by the applicant M/s. Ananta Synthetic Innovations, Survey No.345, Ananda Viramgam Medaadraj road, Manipur, Kadi, Mehsana-382728 (as per the First Schedule to the Customs Tariff Act, 1975(51 of 1975)) as well as the corresponding rate of GST (as per […]
Whether the supply of Occupational Health Check-up service (OHC) by the hospital i.e. nursing staff, Doctors, Paramedical staff on hospital’s payroll working in different corporate for providing health check-up service, ambulance facility, and allied medical services to their employees and also the camps conducted for health check-up outside the hospitals, to be treated as Health Care service and hence not taxable under CGST/SGST?
In re M/s. Wiptech Peripheral pvt. Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat) Applicant has neither filed the application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-01 nor paid the required fees of Rs.10,000/- as required as per the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, […]
In re Maharaja Pratapsinh Coronation Gymkhana (GST AAR Gujarat) Application in the prescribed format of GST-ARA-0 1, they have not paid the required fees of 10,000/- as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 for not paying […]
In re Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC) (GST AAR Gujarat) In the present case the applicant is recipient of the services and not supplier of such services. Accordingly, the application is not liable for admission and therefore rejected without going in to the merits of the case. Instant application filed by M/s. Surat Municipal Corporation (SMC), […]
