Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : In re M/s. Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat)
Appeal Number : Admission Order No. GUJ/GAAR/ADM/2020/118
Date of Judgement/Order : 30/12/2020
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

In re M/s. Khaitan Chemicals and Fertilizers Ltd. (GST AAR Gujarat)

We, therefore, find that the applicant has not paid the fees of Rs.10,000/- under the proper head i.e. ‘CGST’ and ‘GGST’ as required under the provisions of aforementioned Sections and Rules where as paid fees of Rs. 10,000/- under “IGST” head. Therefore, the instant application is liable for rejection under Section 98(2) of the CGST Act, 2017 for not paying the total fees of Rs. 10000/- i.e. under each head CGST & GGST as required under the provisions of CGST Act and Rules and respective GGST Act & Rules.

 In view of the facts mentioned above, we do not find it necessary to delve into the details or facts of the issue in hand since the applicant has failed to comply even with the statutory requirements of the provisions of the relevant sections and rules of the CGST Act, 2017/CGST Rule, 2017 as well as the GGST Act, 2017/GGST Rules, 2017 with regard to filing the application of Advance Ruling before the Advance Ruling Authority, thus rendering it an invalid application for Advance Ruling under Section 97(1) of the CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017.

FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF AUTHORITY OF ADVANCE RULING, GUJARAT

BRIEF FACTS

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031