In re Apar Industries Ltd. (GST AAAR Gujarat) Marine pressure tight cables and non-pressure tight cables manufactured and supplied by the applicant to the Indian Navy are essential and integral parts of the submarine warship and hence the benefit of reduced rate of GST of 5% is available to the appellant as per Sr. No. […]
In re Jayant Snacks and Beverages Pvt. Ltd (GST AAAR Gujarat) Gujarat Authority of Advance Ruling in their ruling has ruled that the product in question ‘different shapes and size Papad’ merit classifiable under CTH No. 21069099 of Customs Tariff Act, 1975 on the grounds that PAPAD is a thing entirely different and distinct from […]
In re Jayant Food Products (GST AAAR Gujarat) Therefore, we are of the view that applicant’s products of different shapes and sizes of papad, whose pictures are reproduced above, are nothing but Papad, classifiable under Tariff Item 1905 90 40 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. Now, the question which arises is, would it be […]
In re Piyush Jayantilal Dobaria (Jay Khodiyar Agency) (GST AAAR Gujarat) The product different shapes and sizes Papad involved in the present case merit classification under Tariff heading No. 19059040 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975 and chargeable to NIL rate of Goods and Services Tax as per Sl. No. 96 of Notification No. 02/2017-CT […]
In re SKG-JK-NMC Associates(JV) (GST AAAR Gujarat) ‘Work Contract’ allotted to the appellant by M/s. RITES ltd. undoubtedly pertains to Railways only. We therefore find and conclude that the ‘Work Contract’ allotted to the appellant by M/s. RITES ltd. is covered under Clause 3(v)(a) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax(Rate) dated 28.06.2017 as amended from time to […]
In re Prag Polymers (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) The classification of the ‘Switch Board Cabinet’, manufactured as per the specific design and layout provided by the Railways and supplied to the Indian Railways only and no- Where else, falls under Chapter Heading 8607 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF APPELLATE […]
In re Platinum Motocorp LLP (GST AAAR Haryana) We find that use to which the Demo Vehicles are put to, does not fit into the uses which find mention in sub-Section 17(5). The vehicles under question are not meant for ‘further supply of such motor vehicles’, but are first put to the mentioned uses. These […]
In re BMW India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Haryana) We find that none of the uses to which the BMW Vehicles are put to, fits into the uses which find mention in sub-Section 17(5). The vehicles under question are not meant for ‘further supply of such motor vehicles’ i.e further supply as such’, but are […]
In re Concord Control Systems Private Limited (GST AAAR Uttar Pradesh) The classification of the Bellow Ducts manufactured as per the specific design and layout provided by the Railways and supplied to the Indian Railways only and no-where else, falls under Chapter heading 8607 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. FULL TEXT OF ORDER OF […]
In re RIICO, Tilak Marg (GST AAAR Rajasthan) Input Tax Credit is not only restricted to the goods and services used for construction of immovable property (whether capitalized or not) but also restricted for those goods and services which are used for re-construction, renovation, additions or alterations or repairs, to the extent of capitalization, to […]
