Amounts received by assessee due to consideration, advance received on sale of small plots which have development work are not taxable under GST.
In re Sterlite Technologies Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The supply under the contract for setting of Naval Communication Network for Indian Navy from 1.4.2019 to 31.12.21 are held as falling under entry at serial number 3(vi)(a) of Notification No.11/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28.06.2017 and accordingly taxable at 6% under CGST and 6% under SGST or 12% […]
In re Indian Hume Pipe Company Ltd (GST AAAR Karnataka) The Appellant has also taken pains to emphasise that BWSSB has been registered with the Income Tax Department and the GST Department as a ‘local authority’; that when both the departments have acknowledged the status of BWSSB as a local authority and accordingly granted them […]
In re Precision Camshafts Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) The moot issues before us are as to whether activity of appellant is an intermediary service as held by the MAAR or as contended by the appellant, an activity of design and development of patterns/tools used for manufacturing of camshafts, for a overseas customer is a composite […]
In re Portescap India Private Limited (GST AAAR Maharashtra) AAAR held that any supply of goods or services or both made to a SEZ developer or SEZ unit for carrying out the authorised operation in SEZ will be considered as zero-rated supply. That is, the said supply will not attract any GST whatsoever. It is […]
In re Shilchar Technologies Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) Whether supply of Aluminium Foil Type Winding Inverter Duty Transformer classifiable under Chapter Heading 8504 and parts of Transformer supplied/to be supplied for initial setting up of solar project falls under Sr. no. 234 in Schedule-I to Notification No. 01/2017-Central Tax (Rate) dated 28th June, 2017 and […]
In re Worley Services India Pvt. Ltd. (GST AAAR Maharashtra) We, hereby, uphold the MAAR Order No. GST-ARA-27/2020-21/B-38 dated 31.03.2022 (‘Impugned Order’) wherein it has been held that the services provided by the Appellant are neither covered under SI. No. 24(ii) nor under SI. No. 21(ia) of the Rate Notification. As regards the classification of […]
GST payable on forest permit fee to forest department as per Rule (3) of State forest produce transit rules on Reverse Charge Mechanism basis
In re Tata Motors Limited (GST AAAR Gujarat) Whether input tax credit (ITC) available to applicant on GST charged by service provider on canteen facility provided to employees working in factory? 2. If ITC is available as per question no. (1) above, whether it will be restricted to the extent of cost borne by the […]
In re Andhra Pradesh Medical Service and Infrastructure Development Corporation (GST AAAR Andhra Pradesh) Question: 1. Whether the procurement and distribution of drugs, medicines and other surgical equipment by APMSIDC on behalf of government without any value addition, and without any profit or loss, without even the intent to do business in the same amounts to […]
