This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Writ Jurisdiction Under Article 226 Cannot Be Invoked If Petitioner Suppressed Material Facts: Bombay HC
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Sai Agencies Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
- Courts
- All High Courts, Bombay High Court
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
Sai Agencies Vs State of Maharashtra (Bombay High Court)
Principles of law interpreted in the Reported Judgment of Sai Agencies Versus State of Maharashtra & Ors. (Writ Petition No. 2067 of 2021)
1. That the Courts shall not ordinarily test the opinion of the experts unless their decision is totally arbitrary or unreasonable. The Courts will only interfere to prevent arbitrariness, irrationality, bias, mala fides or perversity.
2. That when experts evaluate documents of participant bidders, the Courts would be slow in interfering with the said decision unless it is arbitrary or some favour...
