The Hon’ble Supreme Court of India in Re: Cognizance for extension of limitation [Suo Motu Writ Petition (Civil) No.3 of 2020, decided on March 8, 2021] lifted the extension of the limitation period for filing of cases, granted by the Court vide Order dated March 23, 2020 on account of COVID-19 pandemic and the national lockdown which was extended from time to time and held as under:

  • In computing the period of limitation for any suit, appeal, application or proceeding, the period from March 15, 2020 till March 14, 2021 shall stand excluded. Consequently, the balance period of limitation remaining as on March 15, 2020, if any, shall become available with effect from March 15, 2021.
  • In cases where the limitation would have expired during the period between March 15, 2020 till March 14, 2021, notwithstanding the actual balance period of limitation remaining, all persons shall have a limitation period of 90 days from March 15, 2021. In the event the actual balance period of limitation remaining, with effect from March 15, 2021, is greater than 90 days, that longer period shall apply.
  • The period from March 15, 2020 till March 14, 2021 shall also stand excluded in computing the periods prescribed under Sections 23 (4) and 29A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 and provisos (b) and (c) of Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and any other laws, which prescribe period(s) of limitation for instituting proceedings, outer limits (within which the court or tribunal can condone delay) and termination of proceedings.
  • Directed the Government of India to amend the guidelines for containment zones. Further, stated that regulated movement will be allowed for medical emergencies, provision of essential goods and services, and other necessary functions, such as, time bound applications, including for legal purposes, and educational and job-related requirements.

*****

 DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon.

Author Bio

More Under Corporate Law

3 Comments

  1. Om Prakash Jain says:

    Sir,
    It is only a reproduction of SC judgment without your opinion/analysis. Kindly provide your guidance on the following points;
    1.What is your opinion on issuance on notfn No. 43/2020 dated18.5.2020 by CBIC
    during the period of COVID-19 pandemic, implemented w.e.f. 18.5.2020, the restriction on time limit for taking Transitional Credit, u/s 140, CGST Act, 2017, amended retrospectively by the Finance Act, 2020, just to plug/annul the relief given by various courts to the taxable persons.
    2 What is your opinion on. SLP filed by CBIC in the Supreme Court on 19.6.2020 : Union of India & Ors. v. Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. & Ors. (2020) 33 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 419 & obtained Stay against the High Court judgment in the case of Brand Equity Treaties Ltd. v. Union of India (2020) 33 J.K.Jain’s GST & VR 419 (Delhi), which granted a great relief to various citizens of the country by prescribing the period of limitation of 3 years under the Limitation Act for filing Tran-1 so as to facilitate claiming Transitional Credit as on 30.6.2017, u/s 140, CGST Act, 2017.
    Om Prakash Jain 9414300730

  2. Kiran Sankar Chakrabarti says:

    Whether this will be applicable for time limit under section 54 of CGST Act for claiming Refund of Deemed Export Supplies.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search Posts by Date

April 2021
M T W T F S S
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930