Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : New Eureka Travels Club Vs South Bengal State Transport Corporation (Calcutta High Court)
Appeal Number : AP/244/2022
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/05/2022
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

New Eureka Travels Club Vs South Bengal State Transport Corporation (Calcutta High Court)

Held that in case of appointment of a sole arbitrator, the law is very clear that it is the Court that is to decide the sole arbitrator. The persons that have been nominated by the respondent cannot be accepted.

Facts-

In the Section 21 notice issued by the petitioner, the petitioner had submitted that the arbitrator is required to be decided by the Court as the Supreme Court has held that an interested party cannot nominate an arbitrator.

Subsequent to the Section 21 notice, the respondent had given a choice of three learned Advocates of this Hon’ble High Court to be chosen by the petitioner for appointment as sole arbitrator. The petitioner not being agreeable to the same has filed a Section 11 application for appointment of an independent arbitrator to be decided by this Court.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031