Case Law Details

Case Name : Dr. G. Parmeshwara & Anr. Vs Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs (Supreme Court of India)
Appeal Number : Writ Petition (Civil) Diary No. 19482/2018
Date of Judgement/Order : 17/05/2018
Related Assessment Year :
Courts : Supreme Court of India (978)

Dr. G. Parmeshwara & Anr.  Vs Union of India Ministry of Home Affairs (Supreme Court of India)

The petitioners have filed this petition challenging the validity of Communication No.GS 41 GOB 2018 dated 16th May, 2018, addressed by the Governor of Karnataka to Shri B.S. Yeddyurappa (respondent No.3 herein) inviting him to form the government and be sworn in as the Chief Minister of the State of Karnataka. This Bench was specially convened at odd hours to hear the matter as, on the basis of the said letter, respondent No.3 has decided to take oath at 9.30 a.m. on 17th May, 2018.

We have heard Dr. Abhishek Manu Singhvi, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners. On behalf of the Union of India, Mr. K.K. Venugopal, learned Attorney General has appeared, Mr. Mukul Rohatgi, learned senior counsel, has also made submissions, though he has stated that he has instructions from three M.L.As, viz. Mr. Govind M. Karjol, C.M. Udasi and Mr. Basavaraj Bommai, of the B.J.P. party to represent.

The petitioners have impleaded three respondents. Respondent No.1 is the Union of India, and as mentioned above learned Attorney General has appeared on its behalf. Since respondent Nos.2 and 3 are not represented, we issue formal notice to them. In addition, respondent No.2 shall be served through the Standing Counsel for the State.

After hearing the parties, we are of the opinion that it is necessary to peruse the letters dated 15th May, 2018 and 16th May, 2018 submitted by the respondent No.3 to the Governor which find a mention in the communication dated 16th May, 2018 of the Hon’ble Governor. We request the learned Attorney General and/or respondent No.3 to produce these letters on the next date of hearing.

This Court is not passing any order staying the oath taking ceremony of respondent No.3. In case, he is given oath in the meantime, that shall be subject to further orders of this Court and final outcome of the writ petition.

List the matter for further hearing at 10.30 a.m. on 18th May, 2018. The respondents may file their response in the meantime.

Download Judgment/Order

More Under Corporate Law

Posted Under

Category : Corporate Law (3816)
Type : Judiciary (11133)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *