Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Rajiv Rattan Dhingra Vs Enforcement Directorate (Punjab and Haryana High Court)
Appeal Number : CRM-M-22476-2021
Date of Judgement/Order : 13/07/2023
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Rajiv Rattan Dhingra Vs Enforcement Directorate (Punjab and Haryana High Court) 

Introduction: In a noteworthy ruling, the Punjab and Haryana High Court granted bail to Rajiv Rattan Dhingra, arrested in the Nature Heights Infra Scam. The case, titled as “Rajiv Rattan Dhingra Vs Enforcement Directorate,” was under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. The decision, viewed as significant in the legal fraternity, highlights the non-violent nature of the offence.

Analysis: The court deemed that Dhingra, who was accused of financial fraud, was neither a director, shareholder, nor an employee of the companies involved in the case. The prosecution’s argument focused on Dhingra’s alleged involvement in the purchasing of immovable properties, which were later subject to benami proceedings. However, the defence successfully argued that the accused had been granted interim bail previously and had consistently appeared in court as required, without any default.

One of the prominent factors leading to this verdict was the non-violent nature of the offence. Dhingra, running a printing press, had been implicated in the case due to his professional association with the companies under scrutiny. Considering his regular court appearances, the slow pace of the trial, the non-violent nature of the offence, and his personal circumstances including health issues, the court deemed Dhingra fit for bail.

Conclusion: The ruling in the case of Rajiv Rattan Dhingra Vs Enforcement Directorate sets a precedent that bail can be granted considering the non-violent nature of an offence under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act. While this doesn’t affect the merits of the case, it emphasizes the court’s role in ensuring the rights and welfare of the accused are upheld during the trial process. This case underscores the intricate balance the judiciary must maintain between upholding the law and ensuring fair treatment of individuals.

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
July 2024
M T W T F S S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031