Non-stamping of promissory note cannot be reason to reject application u/s. 7 of IBC: NCLAT Delhi

Ravi Auto Ltd. Vs Surana Mercantiles Pvt. Ltd. (NCLAT Delhi)

NCLAT Delhi held that since other materials on record prove the disbursement of amount and default, non-stamping of promissory note is inconsequential and could not be a reason to reject Section 7 application. Accordingly, appeal allowed.

Facts- The Financial Creditor disbursed an amount of Rs.1,00,00,000/- to the Corporate Debtor on 01.11.2016. A Promissory Note was also executed by the Corporate Debtor on 01.11.2016. The disbursement of Rs.1,00,00,000/- was also reflected in the ledger entry of t

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.