Sponsored
    Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Mahantesh Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Sponsored

Mahantesh Vs State of Karnataka (Karnataka High Court)

Karnataka High Court addressed the case of Mahantesh Vs State of Karnataka, where the petitioner challenged the forfeiture of the earnest money deposit (EMD) following a tender process. The petitioner had participated in a tender issued on 15.11.2018, with an original condition (No.10) stating that GST would be paid separately as per a government order. The petitioner was the successful bidder and provided a bank guarantee of Rs. 6,26,310/-. However, a subsequent corrigendum issued on 25.01.2019, amended the GST condition, remo

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.

Sponsored

Author Bio

A Blogger by Passion and a Chartered Accountant by Profession. View Full Profile

My Published Posts

SC upholds validity of e-auction sale conducted by bank SC Interprets the word ‘May’ under Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 Interim Compensation under Section 143A of NI Act Not mandatory: SC WhatsApp Messages Not Conclusive Evidence for Addition: ITAT Chennai Draft MoUs and WhatsApp Chats Alone Don’t Form Binding Contracts: SC View More Published Posts

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sponsored
Sponsored
Ads Free tax News and Updates
Sponsored
Search Post by Date
March 2025
M T W T F S S
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31