This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.
Competition Act – Agreement to manufacture patented drug is not anti-competitive if other players also exist in market
Case Law Details
- Case Name
- Manoj Hirasingh Pardeshi Vs Gilead Sciences Inc., USA (Competition Commission of India)
- Appeal Number
- Only available for paid members
- Date of Judgement/Order
- Only available for paid members
Upgrade to Basic or Premium to download.
Already Upgraded? Log in.
COMPETITION COMMISSION OF INDIA
Manoj Hirasingh Pardeshi
Versus
Gilead Sciences Inc., USA
Ashok Chawla, CHAIRPERSON
H.C. Gupta, GEETA GOURI, ANURAG GOEL AND M.L. TAYAL, AND JUSTICE
S.N. DHINGRA, MEMBER
Case No. 41 of 2012
MARCH 5, 2013
ORDER UNDER SECTION 26(2) OF THE COMPETITION ACT, 2002
1. The information was filed by Manoj Hirasingh Pardeshi (‘the informant’) under section 19(1) of the Competition Act, 2002 (‘the Act’), against Gilead Science Inc., USA (‘the OP’) for alleged contravention of provisions of sections 3 and 4 of the Act.
2. The informant cla...
