Follow Us:

Case Law Details

Case Name : Manik Mehta Vs UCO Bank (Chhattisgarh High Court)
Related Assessment Year :
Become a Premium member to Download. If you are already a Premium member, Login here to access.
Section 17 (3) Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 unequivocally provides that if the measures referred to in sub-section (4) of Section 13, taken by the secured creditor are not in accordance with the provisions of the Act and the Rules made thereunder, and require restoration of possession of the secured assets to the borrower, it may by order, declare the recourse to any one or more measures referred to in sub-section (4) of Section 13 taken by the secured assets as invalid and restore the possession of the secured assets to t...
This is premium content. Please become a Premium member. If you are already a member, login here to access the full content.

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
April 2026
M T W T F S S
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930