Case Law Details
Yogesh Gupta Vs State of Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Pradesh High Court)
Introduction: Yogesh Gupta, the petitioner, finds himself entangled in a legal quagmire, invoking Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Cr.P.C.) to seek pre-arrest bail in connection with the alleged AP TIDCO scam. The charges include various sections of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Background: The petitioner, linked to the Andhra Pradesh Township and Infrastructure Development Corporation (AP TIDCO) scam, asserts innocence amidst ongoing investigations. Citing news reports, briefings, and press conferences, the petitioner claims that the state machinery is misusing public funds for personal vendettas, raising concerns about a lack of checks and balances.
Petitioner’s Stand: Yogesh Gupta alleges that he is being falsely implicated, with his name published in news reports to create an adverse environment. He contends that he has no direct or indirect association with the key figures involved in the scam, emphasizing that the accusations are baseless and lack corroborative evidence.
State’s Counter: In response, the state refutes the petitioner’s claims, stating that no case as described by the petitioner has been registered. The state argues that the petitioner, previously granted anticipatory bail in a related matter, is avoiding the investigation, violating conditions imposed during the bail order.
Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.
