Introduction
When a company decides to lend money to a sister concern, stand guarantee for a business partner, or invest in another company, it is not simply a financial transaction — it is a regulated act. Section 186 of the Companies Act, 2013 draws a clear boundary around these activities to ensure that company funds are deployed responsibly and that shareholders are never kept in the dark.
Before the Companies Act, 2013 came into force, inter-corporate lending and investments were governed under the older 1956 framework, which had several gaps that companies exploited — sometimes at the cost of minority shareholders. The 2013 Act plugged those gaps by prescribing stricter limits, mandatory board and shareholder approvals, a minimum interest rate requirement, and robust disclosure obligations.
What Does Section 186 Actually Cover?
Section 186 casts a wide net. In plain terms, it regulates four categories of transactions that a company may enter into with another person or body corporate:
- Granting a loan to any person or body corporate
- Giving a guarantee or providing security in connection with a loan taken by any person or body corporate
- Acquiring, by way of subscription, purchase or otherwise, the securities of any other body corporate
- Making any inter-corporate investment
The term “body corporate” is deliberately broad and includes companies incorporated in India and abroad, LLPs, and other corporate entities. This means that lending to a foreign subsidiary is equally governed by Section 186, subject to FEMA compliance as well
Understanding the Monetary Limits
Section 186(2) sets the outer boundary within which a company can act without seeking special shareholder approval. The prescribed limit is the higher of the two amounts computed using the following formulas:
Formula 1
60% of (Paid-up Share Capital + Free Reserves + Securities Premium Account)
Formula 2
100% of (Free Reserves + Securities Premium Account)
You pick the higher figure. The aggregate of loans, guarantees, securities and investments outstanding at any point in time must not exceed this limit without a special resolution.
Practical Example — Calculating the Limit
Consider XYZ Ltd., which has the following financials as per its latest audited balance sheet:
1. Paid-up Share Capital: ₹50 crore
2. Free Reserves: ₹80 crore
3. Securities Premium Account: ₹20 crore
Formula 1: 60% × (50 + 80 + 20) = 60% × 150 = ₹90 Crore
Formula 2: 100% × (80 + 20) = ₹100 Crore
Prescribed Limit: Higher of ₹90 crore and ₹100 crore = ₹100 crore
If XYZ Ltd. total outstanding loans + guarantees + investments are below ₹100 crore, it can proceed with board approval alone. Once it crosses that mark, it must first pass a special resolution in a general meeting.
The Three-Tier Approval Framework
Section 186 creates a layered approval process. Each layer is designed to act as a check on the previous one.
Tier 1 — Board Resolution (Always Mandatory)
Every single transaction covered under Section 186 — regardless of its size — must receive prior approval from the Board of Directors. The resolution must reflect the unanimous consent of all directors present at the meeting. Absent directors cannot ratify retrospectively by circular resolution.
Example: ABC Ltd. wants to lend ₹5 crore to its wholly-owned subsidiary PQR Ltd. Even though the amount is well within the prescribed limit, the board must formally pass a resolution before disbursing the amount. The Company Secretary should record the resolution in the board minutes specifying the borrower’s name, loan amount, purpose, and interest rate.
Tier 2 — Special Resolution (When Limits Are Exceeded)
When the aggregate amount outstanding — after adding the proposed transaction — exceeds the prescribed monetary limit, the company must first obtain a special resolution from its shareholders in a general meeting. The notice of the meeting must clearly disclose the purpose, borrower’s details, and terms of the proposed transaction.
Example: Continuing with XYZ Ltd. (limit: ₹100 crore) — if its current outstanding loans and investments total ₹95 crore and it now proposes to invest ₹10 crore in a joint venture company, the aggregate will touch ₹105 crore, crossing the ₹100 crore threshold. Before even convening the board meeting, XYZ Ltd. must pass a special resolution authorising the investment beyond the limit.
Tier 3 — PFI Prior Approval (Where Applicable)
Section 186(5) requires that if a company has borrowed from a Public Financial Institution (PFI) — such as SIDBI, NHB, IFCI, or a scheduled bank — and such loan terms include a restriction or condition, then prior approval of the PFI is mandatory before the company can give a loan, guarantee, security, or make an investment beyond the limits. This requirement is waived if the transaction is within the prescribed limit and the company is not in default.
Example: MN Ltd. has a term loan from SBI with a standard negative covenant stating that inter-corporate lending above ₹25 crore requires lender consent. If MN proposes to lend ₹30 crore to a group company, it must seek SBI’s written approval before doing so, regardless of whether it is within Section 186’s calculated limit.
The Mandatory Interest Rate Requirement
One of the most practically significant requirements under Section 186(7) is that any loan given under this section must carry an interest rate that is not lower than the prevailing yield of a Government Security of comparable maturity — commonly referred to as the G-Sec yield.
The rationale is straightforward: a company should not lend to another entity at below-market rates, as that would effectively amount to a subsidy at the expense of the lending company’s shareholders. If the company can earn, say, 7% on a government bond, it cannot lend at 4% to a related party.
Example: CD Ltd. proposes to lend ₹20 crore to its associate company for 3 years. The prevailing G-Sec yield for 3-year government bonds is 7.2% per annum. CD must charge at least 7.2% interest on this loan. Charging anything lower — say 5% — would be a direct violation of Section 186(7), exposing the company and its directors to penalty under Section 186(13).
What Companies Must Never Do — Key Prohibitions
1. No Transactions During Default
Section 186(6) creates an absolute bar: if any deposit repayment is overdue, or if interest on any deposit has not been paid when due, the company cannot grant any loan, give a guarantee, provide security, or make any investment under Section 186. The bar applies until the default is fully cured.
Example: OP Ltd. accepted public deposits a few years ago. One matured deposit of ₹15 lakh remains unpaid because the depositor’s bank details were not updated. Even though the amount is tiny relative to the company’s size, OP cannot proceed with any Section 186 transaction until this deposit is either paid or the court grants relief.
2. No Exceeding the Two-Investment-Layer Limit
Section 186(1) restricts investment through more than two layers of investment companies. In other words, Company A can invest in Company B (Layer 1), and Company B can invest in Company C (Layer 2), but Company C cannot in turn invest in Company D (Layer 3) through the same chain, unless specific exceptions apply.
Example: If Alpha Holdings invests in Beta Capital (Layer 1), Beta Capital invests in Gamma Ventures (Layer 2), and Gamma Ventures wishes to invest in Delta Realty (Layer 3), this is not permitted under Section 186 unless Delta Realty is in a foreign jurisdiction where such structures are required by local law.
Documentation, Registers, and Disclosures
The MBP-2 Register
Every company covered under Section 186 must maintain a dedicated register in Form MBP-2. This is not a discretionary internal record — it is a statutory register. The register must capture:
1. The name and address of the recipient (borrower/investee)
2. Nature of the transaction (loan / guarantee / security / investment)
3. Amount, date, and terms
4. Purpose of the loan or investment
5. Current status — outstanding balance or whether closed
The register must be kept at the registered office and must be open for inspection by any member during business hours. Failure to maintain the MBP-2 register is a compliance breach in itself and can attract penalties under Section 186(13).
Financial Statement Disclosure
Section 186(4) requires that the company’s financial statements include full particulars of every loan, guarantee, security, or investment made during the financial year. This disclosure must cover:
1. The name of the body corporate / person
2. Amount of loan or investment
3. Purpose for which the loan or guarantee was given
4. Nature of security, if any
Note for auditors: Under Section 143(1) of the Act read with CARO (Companies Auditor’s Report Order), statutory auditors are required to report on whether Section 186 transactions have been properly documented and whether the required approvals were in place. An undisclosed loan or a loan below the G-Sec rate will almost certainly result in an audit qualification.
Key Exemptions Under Section 186
The Act carves out specific situations where Section 186 either does not apply in full or the approval burden is reduced.
Loans and Investments in Wholly-Owned Subsidiaries
Transactions with wholly-owned subsidiaries or with joint venture companies are accorded softer treatment. While board approval remains mandatory, these do not require a special resolution from shareholders — even if the amount exceeds the prescribed limit. This reflects the law’s recognition that group companies within a 100% ownership structure carry a lower risk of conflict of interest.
Example: PR Ltd. holds 100% equity in PER Pvt. Ltd. It wants to grant a ₹150 crore inter-corporate loan to the subsidiary, which exceeds the prescribed ₹120 crore limit. Since PER is a wholly-owned subsidiary, no special resolution is needed — a board resolution suffices.
Banking, Insurance, and Certain NBFCs
Banking companies, insurance companies, housing finance companies, and NBFCs whose principal business is the acquisition of securities are generally exempt from the applicability of Section 186. This is because lending and investing are their core business activities — applying Section 186 to their ordinary course of business would be incongruous.
Employee Loans and Advances
Loans and advances given to employees as part of the company’s HR and service rules fall entirely outside the scope of Section 186. A housing loan or salary advance given by the company to its employees is governed by the service conditions, not by this provision. Companies sometimes mistakenly record these in the MBP-2 register — this is unnecessary and creates confusion.
Consequences of Non-Compliance
Section 186(13) prescribes penalties for any violation of Section 186, including the company and every officer in default. The penalties are as follows:
1. Fine on the company: Minimum ₹25,000, up to ₹5,00,000
2. Fine on every officer in default: Minimum ₹25,000, up to ₹1,00,000
3. Imprisonment of the officer in default: Up to two years (in serious cases)
Beyond statutory penalties, the consequences in practice can be far more damaging. Non-compliance discovered during a merger due diligence or a SEBI or RBI inspection can unravel deals, jeopardise bank relationships, and — in listed companies — trigger stock exchange queries.
Pre-Transaction Compliance Checklist
Before any loan is sanctioned, guarantee issued, or investment made, every compliance officer and Company Secretary should run through the following nine-point checklist:
- Limit Verified- Compute the Section 186(2) limit using current audited financials and confirm the proposed transaction does not breach it.
- Board Resolution Ready- A specific board resolution must be passed before the transaction is executed.
- Special Resolution Needed-If the proposed transaction causes aggregate outstanding to exceed the limit, pass a special resolution first.
- PFI Approval Obtained-Review all loan agreements with banks/PFIs for negative covenants; obtain their prior written consent where required.
- Interest Rate Compliant-Confirm the proposed interest rate is at least equal to the prevailing G-Sec yield for comparable tenure.
- No Default Outstanding- Verify no deposit repayments or interest payments are overdue.
- Layer Limit Complied With- Map the investment chain and confirm the two-layer restriction is not violated.
- MBP-2 Register Updated- Make the MBP-2 entries on the date of the transaction, not at year-end.
- Financial Statement Disclosure Prepared- Prepare the disclosure note for the annual financial statements.
Conclusion
Section 186 is one of those provisions that looks deceptively simple on a first read but reveals considerable depth when you work through real transactions. The monetary limits are easy to calculate, but the approval architecture — board, shareholder, PFI — requires careful sequencing. The default bar is absolute and catches companies off guard when they have forgotten about a small unpaid deposit. The interest rate floor protects shareholders from value leakage. And the documentation requirements, while straightforward, carry real penalties when ignored.
The fundamental spirit of Section 186 is one of stewardship: the board borrows the company’s resources from its shareholders and must demonstrate, through documented approvals and transparent disclosures, that every rupee deployed serves the company’s legitimate business purpose. When that spirit is understood, compliance follows naturally.
******
Disclaimer: This article is prepared for informational and educational purposes only. It does not constitute legal or professional advice. Readers are advised to refer to the applicable statutes, rules, circulars, and notifications, and consult qualified professionals before taking any action based on the contents of this article.
Author Bio
