Follow Us:

The Registrar of Companies, Pune passed an adjudication order under Section 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 imposing penalties for contravention of Section 62(1)(c) read with Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014, with punishment attracted under Section 450. The company voluntarily filed a suo motu application admitting procedural lapses in disclosures relating to the issue of compulsorily convertible debentures, where required information was not properly disclosed in documents attached to Form MGT-14. The default was stated to be inadvertent and without mala fide intent. The Adjudicating Officer noted that the entity qualified as a small company and was recognised as a start-up by DPIIT, making Section 446B applicable for reduced penalties. After considering the replies and rectification steps, penalties were imposed primarily on the company and the designated officer in default, while no penalties were levied on other directors. The order reiterates accountability for procedural compliance in capital issuance.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS
ROC Pune
Registrar Of Companies, PMRDA Green Building, BLOCK A, 1st & 2nd Floor, Near Akurdi Railway Station, Akurdi, Pune, Maharashtra, India, 411044
Phone: 020-27651375,020-27651378
E-mail: roc.pune@mca.gov.in

Order ID: PO/ADJ/02-2026/PU/01557 | Dated: 03/02/2026

ORDER FOR ADJUDICATION OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 454 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013 (‘THE ACT’) FOR VIOLATION OF SECTION 450 OF THE COMPANIES ACT, 2013.

A. Appointment of Adjudicating Officer:

Ministry of Corporate Affairs vide its Gazette notification number S.O. 831(E) dated 24/03/2015 appointed undersigned as Adjudicating Officer in exercise of the powers conferred by section 454 of the  Companies Act, 2013 [herein after known as Act] read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014 for adjudging penalties under the provisions of this Act.

B. Company details:

In the matter relating to ARCATRON MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED [herein after known as Company] bearing CIN U29299PN2015PTC155291, is a company registered with this office under the Provisions of the Companies Act, 2013/1956 having its registered office situated at 403/2, 4TH FLOOR, AMAR TECH PARK, PATIL NAGAR, BALEWADI BANER GAON HAVELI PUNE MAHARASHTRA INDIA 411045

Individual details:

In the matter relating to GANESH SHARAD SONAWANE__________________________________

In the matter relating to LAXMIKANT BANJAREY __________________________________

In the matter relating to SUDHIR MEHTA__________________________________

In the matter relating to KONCHADY SATISH SHENOY __________________________________

In the matter relating to KUNAL KUNDALIK KAMBLE__________________________________

C. Provisions of the Act:

If a company or any officer of a company or any other person contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or the rules made thereunder, or any condition, limitation or restriction subject to which any approval, sanction, consent, confirmation, recognition, direction or exemption in relation to any matter has been accorded, given or granted, and for which no penalty or punishment is provided elsewhere in this Act, the company and every officer of the company who is in default or such other person shall be 1[liable to a penalty of ten thousand rupees, and in case of continuing contravention, with a further penalty of one thousand rupees for each day after the first during which the contravention continues, subject to a maximum of two lakh rupees in case of a company and fifty thousand rupees in case of an officer who is in default or any other person]

D. Facts about the case:

1. Default committed by the officers in default/noticee – The company and the directors have suo-moto filed an application seeking adjudication of penalty u/s 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 for violation of Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. The company in the application has submitted that during the course of due diligence the management of the company realized that while raising the funds by way of issue and allotment of shares and securities, the company has been in non-compliance of Rule 13 (3) of the Companies (Share Capital and Debenture Rules), 2014 in connection to the 150,000 Compulsorily Convertible Debentures issued by the company as approved in EOGM held on 01.08.2019 and filed Form MGT-14 vide H93738185 dated 24.09.2019 MGT-14 filed vide SRN H80485436, dated 02.08.2019 dated 15.07.2017. It has been further submitted by the company that the said discrepancies and irregularities were unintentional and occurred due to an inadvertence.

Thus, the company and its officers in default have violated Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 and are liable for penalty under Section 450 of the Companies Act, 2013.

2. The company and the officers in default have not requested for e-hearing and the Adjudicating Officer is also of the view that the e-hearing is not required in the instant case.

E.Order:

1. The company and the directors have suo-moto filed an application seeking adjudication of penalty u/s 454 of the Companies Act, 2013 for violation of Section 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014. The company in the application has submitted that while raising the funds by way of issue and allotment of shares and securities the company has inadvertently missed to disclosed certain information as required to be disclosed in terms of Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 in the supporting documents which were attached to e-form MGT-14 filed by the company. Accordingly, an adjudication notice was issued, pursuant to which, the company and the officers in default have submitted their replies.

2. In the replies, the noticees have submitted that the company has voluntarily filed a suo moto application wherein the company has admitted and accepted the defaults committed which were purely procedural and unintentional without any mala fide intention or element of fraud. It has been further submitted by the company that the company qualified as a small company within the meaning of the provisions of the Companies Act, 2013 and also duly recognized as a start-up by the Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). Accordingly, the company and the officers in default have prayed for benefit of Section 446B of the Act. Further, the company has also submitted that the company has already passed and filed board resolution designating Mr. Ganesh Sharad Sonawane (DIN: 07028180), Director of the Company, as an ‘Officer in Default’ of the Company within the meaning of Section 2(60) of the Companies Act, 2013.

3. On perusal of the replies by the company and the officers in default, it is observed that the company was duly recognized as a start-up by the Department of Promotion of Industry and Internal Trade (DPIIT). Thus, provision of Section 446B of the Act is applicable in the instant case. Further, the board resolution designating Mr. Ganesh Sharad Sonawane (DIN: 07028180), Director of the Company, as an ‘Officer in Default’ of the Company has been submitted by the company.

4. Now, in exercise of the powers conferred on the undersigned vide Notification dated 24th March 2015 and having considered the replies submitted in response to the notice issued, I hereby impose the penalty on the officers in default for violation of 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013 r/w Rule 13 of the Companies (Share Capital and Debentures) Rules, 2014 punishable under section 450 of the Act as under.

2. The details of penalty imposed on the company, officers in default and others are shown in the table below:

(A) Name of person on whom penalty imposed (B) Rectification of Default required

(C)

Penalty Amount

(D)

Additional Penalty (E) (*Per day of continuing default i.e. date of rectification of default less order issue date) Maximum limit for Penalty (F)
1 ARCATRON MOBILITY PRIVATE LIMITED having CIN as U29299PN2015P TC155291 100000 0 200000
2 GANESH
SHARAD
SONAWANE
having DIN as
07028180
25000 0 50000
3 LAXMIKANT
BANJAREY
having DIN as
06673379
0 0 50000
4 SUDHIR MEHTA having DIN as

00056867

0 0 50000
5 KONCHADY SATISH SHENOY having DIN as 00298581 0 0 50000
6 KUNAL KUNDALIK KAMBLE having DIN as 07811469 0 0 50000

3. The notified officers in default/noticee shall rectify the default mentioned above and pay the penalty, so applicable within 90 days of receipt of the order.

4. The notified officers in default/noticee shall pay the penalty amount via ‘e-Adjudication’ facility which can be accessed through the respective login IDs on the website of Ministry of Corporate Affairs and upload the copy of paid challan / SRN of e-filing (if applicable) on the ‘e-Adjudication’ portal itself. It is also directed that the penalty so imposed upon the officers in default shall be paid from their personal sources/income.

5. Appeal against this order may be filed in writing with the Regional Director, RD Mumbai within a period of sixty days from the date of receipt of this order, in Form ADJ setting for the grounds of appeal and shall be accompanied by a certified copy of this order [Section 454 (5) & 454 (6) of the Act, read with Companies (Adjudication of Penalties) Rules, 2014].

6. For penal consequences of non-payment of penalty within the prescribed time limit, please refer Section 454(8) of the Companies Act, 2013.

Parvez Naikwadi,
Registrar of Companies
ROC Pune

Join Taxguru’s Network for Latest updates on Income Tax, GST, Company Law, Corporate Laws and other related subjects.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Ads Free tax News and Updates
Search Post by Date
February 2026
M T W T F S S
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
232425262728