In absence of ‘Proofs of Receipt’ it is concluded that notices were never served

Rathna Textile Mills Private Limited Vs V.R.A.R. Ramakrishnan (NCLAT Chennai)

NCLAT Delhi held that Notices were never served on the Petitioner/Respondent as there are no ‘Proofs of Receipt’, filed by the Appellant.

Facts- A Company Petition was filed by the Petitioner Shri V.R.A.R. Ramakrishnan, against the Respondents under Sections 397 and 398, read with Sections 402 and 406 of the Companies Act, 1956, challenging the transfer of Shares effected; allotment of shares

Please become a Premium member. If you are already a Premium member, login here to access the full content.