The ITAT in Mumbai has restricted an income tax disallowance on alleged bogus purchases for Quality Heightcon, capping it at 12.5% of the total amount and citing judicial precedents.
In a recent order, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) Mumbai has provided a significant verdict in the case of Rajesh Shivji Shah vs. Income Tax Officer (ITO) for the assessment year 2011-12.
The ITAT in Mumbai has deleted an income tax addition against Rahul M. Dalmia, ruling that the purchases were genuine. The court found that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence and distinguished the case from other precedents.
The Bombay High Court dismissed a tax appeal, ruling that interest earned by a real estate developer on income tax refunds and fixed deposits had a direct nexus with their main business of developing IT Parks and SEZs.
Bombay High Court disposed of a 1999 writ on ITAT premises, holding that additional Benches functioning since 2001 under interim orders need no further directions.
Bombay High Court upheld CIT(A) and ITAT orders deleting penalty of ₹2.75 lakh, holding that ad-hoc estimation of profit from alleged hawala purchases does not amount to concealment of income.
CAAR in Mumbai has classified balloons made from latex rubber for festive and party decoration as toys under Customs Tariff Heading (CTH) 9503, a ruling that subjects them to a significantly higher basic customs duty (BCD) of 70% rather than the 20% applicable to decorative or rubber articles.
The CAAR Mumbai grants SubCom India exemption from Basic Customs Duty (BCD) and IGST on cable laying vessels under Notification No. 50/2017-Customs, clarifying conditions for importers and duty liability on materials used in cable-laying services.
The Telangana Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling has confirmed that renting a building to a government department for a welfare hostel is a taxable service, dismissing claims of GST exemption.
The Karnataka High Court dismissed an appeal by the Income Tax Department, ruling that payments to Syna Media for software licenses are not taxable as royalty, citing the Supreme Court’s precedent in the Engineering Analysis case.
