Explore the comprehensive guide to the new TDS Section 194R of the Income Tax Act effective from July 1, 2022. Understand its applicability, time of deduction, TDS rate, and non-applicability conditions. Delve into the clarification provided by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) through circulars, addressing various scenarios and frequently asked questions (FAQs). Stay informed and compliant with the latest tax regulations on deduction of tax on benefits or perquisites related to business or profession.
Payments towards professional and technical services may carry TDS provisions as covered under section 194J of the Income Tax Act. Learn what Professional Services, Fees for Technical Services, Royalty, and Non-compete Fees mean under Section 194J.
Understand GST on residential and commercial property rent. From July 2017 to date, learn about exemptions, rates, and recent amendments. FAQs on GST for landlords and tenants answered.
Understand TCS on Sale of Goods (Section 206C(1H)) with FAQs. Learn about rates, applicability, and key clarifications. Stay informed on Income Tax Act changes for better compliance.
Explore the significance of internal audit in day-to-day operations under the Companies Act, 2013. Learn about applicability, qualifications, types, and penalties for non-compliance with FAQs.
Jubilant Infrastructure Ltd Vs DCIT (ITAT Delhi) The disallowance of depreciation in quantum proceedings in A.Y.2016-17 has also resulted in corresponding enhancement of deduction under section 80IAB by the equal amount. The AO has also allowed the enhanced deduction in the quantum and, therefore, no prejudice was caused to the revenue by such claim. It […]
Merely placing the blame on the counsel cannot justify the inordinate delay of 1546 days. Even the particulars have not been furnished as to when the appeal was filed, when it was returned, the name of the counsel, whether the appellant had thereafter met the counsel etc. On the basis of such bald statements, we are not inclined to condone the inordinate delay of 1546 days. No sufficient cause has been shown.
C.S.T. Delhi Vs Sojitz Corporation (Supreme Court of India) It is not in dispute that the service tax was sought to be levied for the transaction which has taken place outside India for the period between November, 1999 and March, 2002. The show cause notice was issued on 20.04.2005. It is not in dispute that […]
Patna High Court refuses stay on GST demand for Manokamna, citing Section 16(4) of GST Act. Analysis of the judgment on vires of Section 112 and implications.
CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of DKNV Engineering Pvt Ltd, stating that credit denial based on photocopies of invoices is a procedural lapse, not a valid reason.
