Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision to delete additions made on cash salary payments without proper documentation in Vaibhav Jain Vs DCIT case.
Delhi High Court clarifies that seeking extension under Section 29A of the Arbitration Act does not waive the right to challenge arbitrator’s ineligibility. Detailed analysis provided.
In Rajeev Chaturvedi vs. Commissioner case, Rajasthan High Court rules Article 227 writ petition not applicable for NCDRC orders. Detailed analysis provided.
SL Lumax Limited Vs Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II (Madras high court) This case involves SL Lumax Limited challenging a demand notice issued by the Deputy Commissioner of State Taxes-II (Madras High Court). The dispute centers around the classification of goods manufactured by SL Lumax under the Goods and Services Tax (GST) regime in India. […]
Madras High Court criticizes the classification of Harpic and Lizol under 28% GST slab rate, citing lack of application of mind. Detailed analysis and judgment provided.
CESTAT Allahabad dismisses appeal for violation of Rule 20 due to repeated adjournments. Detailed analysis of the impact of adjournment culture on justice delivery.
Detailed analysis of Finastra International Financial Systems PTE Ltd. Vs ACIT(International Taxation) case where ITAT Delhi ruled that software sales to Indian entities are not taxable under Article 12(3) of India-Singapore DTAA.
Read the detailed analysis of ITAT Delhi’s decision in Bawa Float Glass Ltd Vs DCIT regarding the absence of DIN in statutory approval under section 153D of the Income Tax Act.
Read the detailed analysis of the Allahabad High Court’s decision to grant bail to Qamar Ahmed Kazmi accused of availing excess input tax credit under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 & 120-B IPC.
CESTAT Allahabad rules that payment of VAT/Sales Tax on deemed sales does not automatically exclude the transaction from service tax liability.
