"I am a qualified Chartered Accountant with my experience in tax litigation matters both Income Tax , at an earlier age of 24 I have started representing before CIT(A) & ITAT and have been successful in providing relief to my clients , I have a vast knowledge regarding Futures & Options Transactions , how to get it file and how its taxation is being done. Anyone who wish to contact me can contact me at 9438027980 and mail id is rithikkedia@gmail.com. I will be very pleased to answer/consult anyone's queries."
Learn about the Orissa High Court’s ruling allowing GSTR-1 amendment after the due date for M/s. Chintamaniswar Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Details on rectification process and implications.
Discover how Section 54 & 54F exemptions extend beyond property owners to include spouses and legal heirs. Explore recent ITAT rulings and key judicial interpretations.
Gauhati High Court rules that AO names cannot be reflected in notices issued under Section 148 in a faceless manner, reaffirming procedures under Section 151A.
Navigate moonlighting taxes efficiently. Learn how to file ITR, manage extra income, and avoid penalties in our comprehensive guide for moonlighters in India.
Dive into the recent ITAT judgment on Sec 69B & 115BBE, exploring the treatment of unrecorded stock in a business survey. Analysis of AO, CIT(A), and ITAT perspectives.
Ashvin Narayan Bajoria (HUF) Vs ITO (ITAT Surat) Recently the SMC Bench of Surat Income Tax Appellate Tribunal passed a judgement in the aforementioned case deleting the penalty levied by the Ld. Assessing Officer under section 271(1)(c) of the Act for concealment of income. The central point of discussion was whether or not penalty imposed […]
Read analysis of ITAT judgment in Saraswati Gupta vs. ITO case confirming penalties under sections 271A and 271B for not maintaining and auditing books of account. Learn about the outcome and reasoning.
Explore the recent ITAT Dehradun judgment in Uttarakhand Poorv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Ltd. vs. ITO case, challenging AO’s premature jurisdiction assumption under section 148
